The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Printing accuracy, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, and microbial adhesion of 3D-printed resins with various printing orientations
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Printing orientation is an important decision in the initial steps of additive manufacturing, affecting printing accuracy and the mechanical properties of printed products. In addition, printing orientation determines the building direction of layers and the layer-by-layer configuration forming the surface geometry. PURPOSE The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of printing orientation on the printing accuracy, flexural strength, surface characteristics, and microbial response of 3D-printed denture base resin. MATERIAL AND METHODS Specimens were printed with denture base polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) in 3 printing orientations (0, 45, and 90 degrees). The printing error rate, flexural strength, roughness, hydrophilicity, surface energy, and response to Candida albicans (C. albicans) were evaluated. RESULTS Specimens printed at a 90-degree orientation showed the lowest error rates for length (P<.001), and those printed at a 45-degree orientation showed statistically higher error rates for thickness than those of other groups (P<.001). Flexural strength increased in order of the specimens printed at orientation degrees of 90<45<0 with statistical significance. The 45-degree oriented specimens showed higher roughness and surface energy than those of other groups (P<.001). A higher proportion of C. albicans was found in the specimens printed at orientation degrees of 90<45<0 with statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS Printing orientation significantly influenced the printing accuracy, flexural strength, roughness, and response to C. albicans. Therefore, the printing orientation should be carefully decided to fabricate products with appropriate properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kim, D., Shim, J.-S., Lee, D., Shin, S.-H., Nam, N.-E., Park, K.-H., Shim, J.-S., & Kim, J.-E. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym12112762 · Cited by 253
Self-citationDimensional Accuracy in 3D Printed Medical Models: A Follow-Up Study on SLA and SLS Technology
Msallem, B., Vavrina, J. J., Beyer, M., Halbeisen, F. S., Lauer, G., Dragu, A., & Thieringer, F. M. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13195848 · Cited by 40
Study on Geometry, Dimensional Accuracy and Structure of Parts Produced by Multi Jet Fusion
Adach, M., Sokołowski, P., Piwowarczyk, T., & Nowak, K. (2021) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma14164510 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Shim, J. S., Kim, J.-E., Jeong, S. H., Choi, Y. J., & Ryu, J. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 468-475
- ISSN
- 0022-3913 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2991866212
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Printing accuracy, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, and microbial adhesion of 3D-printed resins with various printing orientations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.034
- The paper
- Shim, J. S., Kim, J.-E., Jeong, S. H., Choi, Y. J., & Ryu, J. J. (2020). Printing accuracy, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, and microbial adhesion of 3D-printed resins with various printing orientations. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.