Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 418

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Printing accuracy, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, and microbial adhesion of 3D-printed resins with various printing orientations

Shim, Ji Suk, Kim, Jong-Eun, Jeong, Sang Hoon, Choi, Yeon Jo, Ryu, Jae Jun·2020·The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Printing orientation is an important decision in the initial steps of additive manufacturing, affecting printing accuracy and the mechanical properties of printed products. In addition, printing orientation determines the building direction of layers and the layer-by-layer configuration forming the surface geometry. PURPOSE The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of printing orientation on the printing accuracy, flexural strength, surface characteristics, and microbial response of 3D-printed denture base resin. MATERIAL AND METHODS Specimens were printed with denture base polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) in 3 printing orientations (0, 45, and 90 degrees). The printing error rate, flexural strength, roughness, hydrophilicity, surface energy, and response to Candida albicans (C. albicans) were evaluated. RESULTS Specimens printed at a 90-degree orientation showed the lowest error rates for length (P<.001), and those printed at a 45-degree orientation showed statistically higher error rates for thickness than those of other groups (P<.001). Flexural strength increased in order of the specimens printed at orientation degrees of 90<45<0 with statistical significance. The 45-degree oriented specimens showed higher roughness and surface energy than those of other groups (P<.001). A higher proportion of C. albicans was found in the specimens printed at orientation degrees of 90<45<0 with statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS Printing orientation significantly influenced the printing accuracy, flexural strength, roughness, and response to C. albicans. Therefore, the printing orientation should be carefully decided to fabricate products with appropriate properties.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.034

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 418

Metadata

Authors
Shim, J. S., Kim, J.-E., Jeong, S. H., Choi, Y. J., & Ryu, J. J.
Venue
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
124
Issue
4
Pages
468-475
ISSN
0022-3913 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2991866212
Cited by
418
References
0
FWCI
30.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Printing accuracy, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, and microbial adhesion of 3D-printed resins with various printing orientations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.034
The paper
Shim, J. S., Kim, J.-E., Jeong, S. H., Choi, Y. J., & Ryu, J. J. (2020). Printing accuracy, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, and microbial adhesion of 3D-printed resins with various printing orientations. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.034

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.