Cited by 40Anatomy and Medical TechnologyAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies3D Printing in Biomedical Research

Dimensional Accuracy in 3D Printed Medical Models: A Follow-Up Study on SLA and SLS Technology

Open access
Msallem, Bilal, Vavrina, Joel J., Beyer, Michel, Halbeisen, Florian S., Lauer, Günter, Dragu, Adrian, Thieringer, Florian M.·2024·Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract

Background: With the rise of new 3D printers, assessing accuracy is crucial for obtaining the best results in patient care. Previous studies have shown that the highest accuracy is achieved with SLS printing technology; however, SLA printing technology has made significant improvements in recent years. Methods: In this study, a realistic anatomical model of a mandible and skull, a cutting guide for mandibular osteotomy, and a splint for orthognathic surgery were replicated five times each using two different 3D printing technologies: SLA and SLS. Results: The SLA group had a median trueness RMS value of 0.148 mm and a precision RMS value of 0.117 mm. The SLS group had a median trueness RMS value of 0.144 mm and a precision RMS value of 0.096 mm. There was no statistically significant difference in RMS values between SLS and SLA technologies regarding trueness. Regarding precision, however, the RMS values for SLS technology were significantly lower in the splint and cutting guide applications than those printed with SLA technology. Conclusions: Both 3D printing technologies produce modern models and applications with equally high dimensional accuracy. Considering current cost pressures experienced by hospitals, the lower-cost SLA 3D printer is a reliable choice for point-of-care 3D printing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jcm13195848

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SLA achieves high resolution and is suitable for fabricating intricate structures.

    “This technique achieves high resolution and is suitable for fabricating intricate structures [100, 101].”

    From Application of PLCL as a biodegradable polymer in biomedical engineering (2026) · cites this paper as [101]

    The Discussion reports that the SLA printer can print layers as thin as 25 µm, and the Conclusions describe its printed medical models as highly accurate. These passages support the high-resolution aspect, but the paper does not establish that SLA is suitable for fabricating intricate structures; its Introduction notes that SLA requires supports and offers less design freedom than SLS. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [40]Yeager B.J. Accuracy Analysis with Surgical Guides When Different 3D Printing Technologies Are Used Master’s Thesis Ohio State University Columbus, OH, USA 2022 1 64

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Msallem, B., Vavrina, J. J., Beyer, M., Halbeisen, F. S., Lauer, G., Dragu, A., & Thieringer, F. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE)
  • UniversityCenter for Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, DE-01307 Dresden, Germany
Corresponding author
Msallem, Bilal
Venue
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-09-30
Volume
13
Issue
19
Pages
5848
ISSN
2077-0383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402987968
Cited by
40
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 15
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Werner Siemens Foundation
  • TU Dresden
  • Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine
  • SLUB Dresden
  • Open Access Publication Funding of the DFG
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Keywords
dimensional accuracy, 3D printing, stereolithography, selective laser sintering, biomedical model, mandible, skull, mandibular osteotomy, orthognathic surgery, splints, cutting guides, trueness, precision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review