Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

First Steps Towards an Intelligent Laser Welding Architecture Using Deep Neural Networks and Reinforcement Learning

Open access
Günther, Johannes, Pilarski, Patrick M., Helfrich, Gerhard, Shen, Hao, Diepold, Klaus·2014·Procedia Technology

Abstract

To address control difficulties in laser welding, we propose the idea of a self-learning and self-improving laser welding system that combines three modern machine learning techniques. We first show the ability of a deep neural network to extract meaningful, low-dimensional features from high-dimensional laser-welding camera data. These features are then used by a temporal-difference learning algorithm to predict and anticipate important aspects of the system's sensor data. The third part of our proposed architecture suggests using these features and predictions to learn to deliver situation-appropriate welding power; preliminary control results are demonstrated using a laser-welding simulator. The intelligent laser-welding architecture introduced in this work has the capacity to improve its performance without further human assistance and therefore addresses key requirements of modern industry. To our knowledge, it is the first demonstrated combination of deep learning and Nexting with general value functions and also the first usage of deep learning for laser welding specifically and production engineering in general. This work also provides a unique example of how predictions can be explicitly learned using reinforcement learning to support laser welding. We believe that it would be straightforward to adapt our approach to other production engineering applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.protcy.2014.09.007

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Jaeger, 2008, Sputter tracking for the automatic monitoring of industrial laser-welding processes, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 55, 2177, 10.1109/TIE.2008.918637 · doi:10.1109/tie.2008.918637
  2. Alippi, 2001, A methodological approach to multisensor classification for innovative laser material processing units, IMTC, 3, 1762
  3. Schroth, 2009, A cognitive system for autonomous robotic welding, IEEE/RSJ IROS, 3148
  4. Haykin, 2012, Cognitive Control. IEEE, 100, 3156
  5. Zipkin, 1997, The limits of mass customization, Harvard Business Review, 75, 91
  6. Hinton, 2006, Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks, Science, 313, 504, 10.1126/science.1127647 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Lange, 2012, Autonomous reinforcement learning on raw visual input data in a real world application, IJCNN, 1
  8. Vincent, 2010, Stacked denoising autoencoders: Learning useful representations in a deep network with a local denoising criterion, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11, 3371
  9. Liu, 2005, Neural network model for time series prediction by reinforcement learning, IEEE IJCNN, 2, 809
  10. Sutton, 2011, Horde: a scalable real-time architecture for learning knowledge from unsupervised sensorimotor interaction, AAMAS, 761
  11. Modayil, 2012, Acquiring a broad range of empirical knowledge in real time by temporal-difference learning, IEEE SMC, 1903
  12. Modayil, 2014, Multi-timescale nexting in a reinforcement learning robot, Adaptive Behavior, 22, 146, 10.1177/1059712313511648 · DOI
  13. Pilarski, 2011, Online human training of a myoelectric prosthesis controller via actor-critic reinforcement learning, IEEE ICORR, 1
  14. Kimura, 2001, Reinforcement learning of walking behavior for a four-legged robot CDC, 1, 411
  15. Thomas, 2009, Application of the actor-critic architecture to functional electrical stimulation control of a human arm IAAI, 165
  16. Peters, 2008, Reinforcement learning of motor skills with policy gradients, Neural Networks, 21, 682, 10.1016/j.neunet.2008.02.003 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Pilarski, 2013, Real-time prediction learning for the simultaneous actuation of multiple prosthetic joints, IEEE ICORR, 1
  18. Ancona, 2001, Optical sensor for real-time monitoring of CO2 laser welding process, Applied Optics, 40, 6019, 10.1364/AO.40.006019 · DOI
  19. Shao, 2005, Review of techniques for on-line monitoring and inspection of laser welding, Journal of Physics, 15, 101
  20. Kroos, 1993, Dynamic behaviour of the keyhole in laser welding, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 26, 481, 10.1088/0022-3727/26/3/022 · doi:10.1088/0022-3727/26/3/022
  21. Beersiek, 2001, A CMOS camera as tool for process analysis not only for laser beam welding, ICALEO, 92, 1185
  22. Min-ying, 2010, The research of welding parameters on weld shape in the laser deep penetration welding, MACE, 3734
  23. Sutton RS, Barto AG. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. MIT Press; 1998. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 303

Metadata

Authors
Günther, J., Pilarski, P. M., Helfrich, G., Shen, H., & Diepold, K.
Venue
Procedia Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014
Volume
15
Pages
474-483
ISSN
2212-0173 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088897029
Cited by
303
References
5
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: First Steps Towards an Intelligent Laser Welding Architecture Using Deep Neural Networks and Reinforcement Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.protcy.2014.09.007
The paper
Günther, J., Pilarski, P. M., Helfrich, G., Shen, H., & Diepold, K. (2014). First Steps Towards an Intelligent Laser Welding Architecture Using Deep Neural Networks and Reinforcement Learning. Procedia Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2014.09.007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.