Cited by 10Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceAttachment and Relationship DynamicsCrime Patterns and Interventions

Attachement amoureux, agressivité émotionnelle et instrumentale chez des auteurs de violence conjugale

Carraud, L., Jaffé, P.-D., Sillitti-Dokic, F.·2008·Pratiques Psychologiques

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.prps.2007.10.001

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carraud, L., Jaffé, P.-D., & Sillitti-Dokic, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Carraud, L.
Venue
Pratiques Psychologiques
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
481-490
ISSN
1269-1763 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054672726
Cited by
10
References
23
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
closed
Locations
Pratiques Psychologiques (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
romantic attachment, insecure attachment, domestic violence, emotional aggression, proactive aggression, attachment styles, incarcerated offenders, marital conflict

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review