Cited by 205Air Quality and Health ImpactsAsthma and respiratory diseasesIndoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure

Air pollution during pregnancy and lung development in the child

Korten, Insa, Ramsey, Kathryn, Latzin, Philipp·2017·Paediatric Respiratory Reviews

Abstract

Air pollution exposure has increased extensively in recent years and there is considerable evidence that exposure to particulate matter can lead to adverse respiratory outcomes. The health impacts of exposure to air pollution during the prenatal period is especially concerning as it can impair organogenesis and organ development, which can lead to long-term complications. Exposure to air pollution during pregnancy affects respiratory health in different ways. Lung development might be impaired by air pollution indirectly by causing lower birth weight, premature birth or disturbed development of the immune system. Exposure to air pollution during pregnancy has also been linked to decreased lung function in infancy and childhood, increased respiratory symptoms, and the development of childhood asthma. In addition, impaired lung development contributes to infant mortality. The mechanisms of how prenatal air pollution affects the lungs are not fully understood, but likely involve interplay of environmental and epigenetic effects. The current epidemiological evidence on the effect of air pollution during pregnancy on lung function and children's respiratory health is summarized in this review. While evidence for the adverse effects of prenatal air pollution on lung development and health continue to mount, rigorous actions must be taken to reduce air pollution exposure and thus long-term respiratory morbidity and mortality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.prrv.2016.08.008

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Korten, I., Ramsey, K., & Latzin, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Latzin, Philipp
Venue
Paediatric Respiratory Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
21
Pages
38-46
ISSN
1526-0542 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2515386017
Cited by
205
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Paediatric Respiratory Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Keywords
prenatal air pollution exposure, particulate matter, lung development, children's respiratory health, lung function, childhood asthma, birth weight, preterm birth, immune system development, infant mortality, epigenetics, organogenesis
MeSH terms
Air Pollution, Asthma, Child, Environmental Exposure, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant Mortality, Infant, Newborn, Lung, Lung Diseases, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review