Cited by 33Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumEthics and bioethics in healthcareEthics in medical practice

Ethical Issues in Perinatal Mental Health

Miller, Laura J.·2009·Psychiatric Clinics of North America

Abstract

The principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice can guide clinicians in finding ethical approaches to the treatment of women who have psychiatric disorders during preconception, pregnancy, and postpartum. Table 1 summarizes some clinical dilemmas in perinatal mental health care, the ethical conundrums posed by these situations, and guiding principles or tools that can help clinicians resolve ethical conflicts. The concept of relational ethics helps resolve apparent mother-offspring ethical conflicts, and the practice of preventive ethics helps anticipate and reduce the risk of ethical dilemmas and adverse clinical outcomes. These central principles suggest the following guidelines in caring for perinatal women: In situations that seem to pit the needs of a pregnant or postpartum woman against the needs of her fetus or baby, reframe the problem to find a solution that most benefits the mother-baby dyad while posing the least risk to the dyad. In evaluating a pregnant woman's ability to make autonomous, informed decisions about medical care, assess her ability to decide on behalf of both herself and her fetus. When explaining the risks of treatments such as psychotropic medication during pregnancy, avoid errors of omission by also explaining the risks of withholding the treatments. Apply the principle of justice to ensure that women are not stigmatized by having psychiatric disorders or by being pregnant. When screening for maternal psychiatric symptoms, en…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psc.2009.02.002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, L. J.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Laura J.
Venue
Psychiatric Clinics of North America
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-06
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
259-270
ISSN
0193-953X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042608366
Cited by
33
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Clinics of North America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
Keywords
perinatal mental health, maternal mental illness, ethical decision-making, relational ethics, preventive ethics, informed consent, mother-infant dyads, justice, stigma, family planning, prenatal and postpartum care
MeSH terms
Ethics, Medical, Female, Humans, Infant, Mental Health, Physician-Patient Relations, Postnatal Care, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Prenatal Care, Psychiatry, Parenting, Risk Assessment, Third-Party Consent, Beneficence, Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Directive Counseling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review