The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Industry 4.0 as enabler for a sustainable development: A qualitative assessment of its ecological and social potential
Abstract
Abstract In 2015, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted the Agenda 2030 which counts 17 indivisible and self-sustaining goals. These so-called Sustainable Development Goals are intended to serve as a foundation for a transformation of the global economies towards a sustainable development. This transformation process should be built on an economic development in accordance with social equality and within ecological boundaries. As essential stakeholders for a global sustainable development, industrial organizations have to shift towards a novel paradigm which puts an emphasis on sustainable value creation. Industrial value creation has gone through radical changes during the last years. Since the 2010s, the so-called fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0) can be observed. The state of the art in research and technology for Industry 4.0 and sustainability is outlined. The potential for sustainable value creation in Industry 4.0 is qualitatively assessed for a macro and micro perspective based on a literature review and expert interviews. The assessment unfolds that the value creation might positively contribute to a sustainable development in many cases. Critical areas with expected negative contributions related to the quantity of materials used, primary energy consumption, and working conditions are identified and elaborated in more detail. A demonstrator for an intelligent cube production is investigated in order to verify the results of the assessment. This demonstrator is currently set up in China as part of a Sino-German Research Institute.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
(2018) · A New Era in Global Health · doi:10.1891/9780826190123.ap02 · Cited by 19,351
The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019 · Cited by 8,727
Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
(2022) · Sustainable Development Goals · doi:10.5040/9781509934058.0025 · Cited by 6,562
Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective
Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.299 · Cited by 2,119
An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies
Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2009) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.05.011 · Cited by 2,069
Opportunities of Sustainable Manufacturing in Industry 4.0
Stock, T., & Seliger, G. (2016) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.129 · Cited by 1,893
Self-citationReport of the World Commission on Environment and Development
Secretary-General, U. (1987) · Cited by 1,728
“Uncovering” Industrial Symbiosis
Chertow, M. R. (2007) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1162/jiec.2007.1110 · Cited by 1,173
SUSTAINABLE INDUSTRIAL VALUE CREATION: BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES OF INDUSTRY 4.0
KIEL, D., MÜLLER, J. M., ARNOLD, C., & VOIGT, K.-I. (2017) · International Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1142/s1363919617400151 · Cited by 769
The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2016
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2016) · The Sustainable Development Goals Report · doi:10.18356/3405d09f-en · Cited by 759
Cited by
Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies
Frank, A. G., Dalenogare, L. S., & Ayala, N. F. (2019) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.004 · Cited by 2,958
Li, Y., Dai, J., & Cui, L. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107777 · Cited by 922
Bag, S., Pretorius, J. H. C., Gupta, S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120420 · Cited by 910
Digital Twin as a Service (DTaaS) in Industry 4.0: An Architecture Reference Model
Aheleroff, S., Xu, X., Zhong, R. Y., & Lu, Y. (2021) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2020.101225 · Cited by 658
Bonilla, S. H., Silva, H. R. O., Terra da Silva, M., Franco Gonçalves, R., & Sacomano, J. B. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10103740 · Cited by 645
Metadata
- Authors
- Stock, T., Obenaus, M., Kunz, S., & Kohl, H.
- Venue
- Process Safety and Environmental Protection
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 118
- Pages
- 254-267
- ISSN
- 0263-8762 (ISSN-L)
- 0957-5820
- OpenAlex
- W2811273693
- Cited by
- 512
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 40.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Industry 4.0 as enabler for a sustainable development: A qualitative assessment of its ecological and social potential. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.psep.2018.06.026
- The paper
- Stock, T., Obenaus, M., Kunz, S., & Kohl, H. (2018). Industry 4.0 as enabler for a sustainable development: A qualitative assessment of its ecological and social potential. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.06.026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.