The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Industry 4.0 implementation for multinationals
Abstract
Abstract Delivering on digitalization for large multinational business, in the contemporary context of global operations and real time delivery, is a significant opportunity. Operations of localised facilities independent of global operations can result in compromised global synergies. Centralised functions such as research and development, optimisations of assets, corporate planning (strategy, investment planning, financial), and supply chain together with any other function deliver significant business value. Integration of these functions via industry 4.0 delivers significant business value, delivering strategic and operational benefits. This research proposes a global system approach, as defined by industry 4.0 (vertical, horizontal and total business integration), to this challenge, from ERP through manufacturing systems down to instrumentation. The proposed work resolves the inter-site challenges together with global standardization and inter-functional integration. This proposed architecture is reinforced by a simulation illustrating the benefits of the integrated business.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organization design: an information processing view
Galbraith, J. R. (1974) · Interfaces · doi:10.1287/inte.4.3.28 · Cited by 2,451
The industrial management of SMEs in the era of Industry 4.0
Moeuf, A., Pellerin, R., Lamouri, S., Tamayo-Giraldo, S., & Barbaray, R. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1372647 · Cited by 1,188
Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology
Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A., & Sambamurthy, V (2006) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000600 · Cited by 1,063
Cited by
Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies
Frank, A. G., Dalenogare, L. S., & Ayala, N. F. (2019) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.004 · Cited by 2,958
Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability
Ghobakhloo, M. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119869 · Cited by 2,115
Bag, S., Pretorius, J. H. C., Gupta, S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120420 · Cited by 910
Self-citationImpact of artificial intelligence on employees working in industry 4.0 led organizations
Malik, N., Tripathi, S. N., Kar, A. K., & Gupta, S. (2022) · International Journal of Manpower · doi:10.1108/ijm-03-2021-0173 · Cited by 416
Self-citationSony, M., & Naik, S. (2020) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2019.1691278 · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Telukdarie, A., Buhulaiga, E., Bag, S., Gupta, S., & Luo, Z.
- Venue
- Process Safety and Environmental Protection
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 118
- Pages
- 316-329
- ISSN
- 0263-8762 (ISSN-L)
- 0957-5820
- OpenAlex
- W2810880535
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 22.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.