Cited by 416Technostress in Professional SettingsAI and HR TechnologiesCorporate Management and Leadership

Impact of artificial intelligence on employees working in industry 4.0 led organizations

Malik, Nishtha, Tripathi, Shalini Nath, Kar, Arpan Kumar, Gupta, Shivam·2022·International Journal of Manpower

Abstract

Purpose: This study attempts to develop a practical understanding of the positive and negative employee experiences due to artificial intelligence (AI) adoption and the creation of technostress. It unravels the human resource development-related challenges with the onset of Industry 4.0. Design/methodology/approach: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 professionals with average work experience of 7.6 years and working across nine industries, and the transcripts were analyzed using NVivo. Findings: The findings establish prominent adverse impacts of the adoption of AI, namely, information security, data privacy, drastic changes resulting from digital transformations and job risk and insecurity brewing in the employee psyche. This is followed by a hierarchy of factors comprising the positive impacts, namely, work-related flexibility and autonomy, creativity and innovation and overall enhancement in job performance. Further factors contributing to technostress (among employees): work overload, job insecurity and complexity were identified. Practical implications: The emerging knowledge economy and technological interventions are changing the existing job profiles, hence the need for different skillsets and technological competencies. The organizations thus need to deploy strategic manpower development measures involving up-gradation of skills and knowledge management. Inculcating requisite skills requires well-designed training programs using specialized tools and virtual reality (VR). In addition, employees need to be supported in their evolving socio-technical relationships, for managing both positive and negative outcomes. Originality/value: This research makes the unique contribution of establishing a qualitative hierarchy of prominent factors constituting unintended consequences, positive impacts and technostress creators (among employees) of AI deployment in organizational processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/ijm-03-2021-0173

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malik, N., Tripathi, S. N., Kar, A. K., & Gupta, S.
Affiliations
  • Jaipuria Institute of Management (IN)
  • Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
  • NEOMA Business School (FR)
Venue
International Journal of Manpower
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2021-06-18
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
334-354
ISSN
0143-7720 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3173865241
Cited by
416
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 96 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 108 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 1
FWCI
52.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Manpower (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Management and Leadership
Keywords
artificial intelligence adoption, Industry 4.0, technostress, employee experience, job insecurity, digital transformation, information security, data privacy, work flexibility, employee autonomy, creativity and innovation, employee performance, work overload, human resource development, virtual reality training, knowledge management, unintended consequences of AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review