Impact of artificial intelligence on employees working in industry 4.0 led organizations
Abstract
Purpose: This study attempts to develop a practical understanding of the positive and negative employee experiences due to artificial intelligence (AI) adoption and the creation of technostress. It unravels the human resource development-related challenges with the onset of Industry 4.0. Design/methodology/approach: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 professionals with average work experience of 7.6 years and working across nine industries, and the transcripts were analyzed using NVivo. Findings: The findings establish prominent adverse impacts of the adoption of AI, namely, information security, data privacy, drastic changes resulting from digital transformations and job risk and insecurity brewing in the employee psyche. This is followed by a hierarchy of factors comprising the positive impacts, namely, work-related flexibility and autonomy, creativity and innovation and overall enhancement in job performance. Further factors contributing to technostress (among employees): work overload, job insecurity and complexity were identified. Practical implications: The emerging knowledge economy and technological interventions are changing the existing job profiles, hence the need for different skillsets and technological competencies. The organizations thus need to deploy strategic manpower development measures involving up-gradation of skills and knowledge management. Inculcating requisite skills requires well-designed training programs using specialized tools and virtual reality (VR). In addition, employees need to be supported in their evolving socio-technical relationships, for managing both positive and negative outcomes. Originality/value: This research makes the unique contribution of establishing a qualitative hierarchy of prominent factors constituting unintended consequences, positive impacts and technostress creators (among employees) of AI deployment in organizational processes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI systems can help employees monitor their daily activities and analyse their performance.
“Recent evidence shows that AI systems can help employees monitor their daily activities and analyse their performance (A. Malik et al., 2022).”
From The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Workers' Skills: Upskilling and Reskilling in Organisations (2023) · cites this paper as A. Malik et al., 2022
Cites
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732315617444 · Cited by 12,703 · see citing works
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250983 · Cited by 5,042 · see citing works
Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues
Lu, Y. (2017) · Journal of Industrial Information Integration · doi:10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005 · Cited by 3,012 · see citing works
Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0165 · Cited by 2,060 · see citing works
The Impact of Technostress on Role Stress and Productivity
Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222240109 · Cited by 1,904 · see citing works
The forthcoming artificial intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms
Makridakis, S. (2017) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2017.03.006 · Cited by 1,866 · see citing works
Does Sample Size Matter in Qualitative Research?: A Review of Qualitative Interviews in is Research
Marshall, B., Cardon, P., Poddar, A., & Fontenot, R. (2013) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2013.11645667 · Cited by 1,636 · see citing works
Technology usage, expected job sustainability, and perceived job insecurity
Nam, T. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.017 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Eriksson, T., Bigi, A., & Bonera, M. (2020) · The TQM Journal · doi:10.1108/tqm-12-2019-0303 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chowdhury, S., Dey, P., Joel-Edgar, S., Bhattacharya, S., Rodriguez-Espindola, O., Abadie, A., & Truong, L. (2023) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100899 · Cited by 927 · see citing works
Ali, O., Abdelbaki, W., Shrestha, A., Elbasi, E., Alryalat, M. A. A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2023.100333 · Cited by 568 · see citing works
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Workers' Skills: Upskilling and Reskilling in Organisations
Morandini, S., Fraboni, F., De Angelis, M., Puzzo, G., Giusino, D., & Pietrantoni, L. (2023) · Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline · doi:10.28945/5078 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
Rožman, M., Oreški, D., & Tominc, P. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15065019 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
The job demands-resources model as a theoretical lens for the bright and dark side of digitization
Scholze, A., & Hecker, A. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108177 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
- Authors
- Malik, N., Tripathi, S. N., Kar, A. K., & Gupta, S.
- Affiliations
- Jaipuria Institute of Management (IN)
- Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
- NEOMA Business School (FR)
- Venue
- International Journal of Manpower
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2021-06-18
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 334-354
- ISSN
- 0143-7720 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3173865241
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 96 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 108 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 52.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Manpower (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Management and Leadership
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence adoption, Industry 4.0, technostress, employee experience, job insecurity, digital transformation, information security, data privacy, work flexibility, employee autonomy, creativity and innovation, employee performance, work overload, human resource development, virtual reality training, knowledge management, unintended consequences of AI
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review