Geothermal assisted hydrogen liquefaction systems integrated with liquid nitrogen precooling; Thermoeconomic comparison of Claude and reverse Brayton cycle for liquid nitrogen supply
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Claude cycle uses more heat exchangers to liquefy H2 and has greater efficiency than the L-H process.
“Also, the Claude cycle compared to the L–H process uses more heat exchangers to liquefy H2 and has a greater efficiency.68,69”
From Strategies To Improve the Performance of Hydrogen Storage Systems by Liquefaction Methods: A Comprehensive Review (2023) · cites this paper as [68]
The main advantage of the Claude system compared to the L-H process is the presence of an expansion device that partially powers the system.
“The main advantage of the Claude system (as an improved L–H process) compared to the L–H process is the presence of an expansion device that partially powers the system.”
From Strategies To Improve the Performance of Hydrogen Storage Systems by Liquefaction Methods: A Comprehensive Review (2023) · cites this paper as [68]
The LH2 cost rate and total exergy efficiency based on the Claude cycle were calculated to be 7.03 $/kg and 70.52%, respectively.
“Also, the LH2 cost rate and total exergy efficiency based on the Claude cycle were calculated to be 7.03 $/kg and 70.52%, respectively.”
From Strategies To Improve the Performance of Hydrogen Storage Systems by Liquefaction Methods: A Comprehensive Review (2023) · cites this paper as [323]
The Claude process is more suitable than the inverse Brayton cycle considering cost and exergy rates.
“The results indicated that the Claude process is more suitable than the inverse Brayton cycle considering cost and exergy rates.”
From Strategies To Improve the Performance of Hydrogen Storage Systems by Liquefaction Methods: A Comprehensive Review (2023) · cites this paper as [323]
The LH2 cost rate and total exergy efficiency based on the inverse Brayton cycle were calculated to be 7.03 $/kg and 61.73%, respectively.
“The LH2 cost rate and total exergy efficiency based on the inverse Brayton cycle were calculated to be 7.03 $/kg and 61.73%, respectively.”
From Strategies To Improve the Performance of Hydrogen Storage Systems by Liquefaction Methods: A Comprehensive Review (2023) · cites this paper as [323]
Cites
Riaz, A., Qyyum, M. A., Min, S., Lee, S., & Lee, M. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117471 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Geothermal energy use in absorption precooling for Claude hydrogen liquefaction cycle
Kanoglu, M., Yilmaz, C., & Abusoglu, A. (2016) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.068 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Hydrogen liquefaction process using solar energy and organic Rankine cycle power system
Ghorbani, B., Mehrpooya, M., Aasadnia, M., & Niasar, M. S. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.227 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Karimi, M., Mehrpooya, M., & pourfayaz, F. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130001 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Naquash, A., Qyyum, M. A., Islam, M., Sial, N. R., Min, S., Lee, S., & Lee, M. (2022) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.115200 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Yilmaz, C. (2018) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.063 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Taghavi, M., Salarian, H., & Ghorbani, B. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128821 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Lee, D., Quarme Gbadago, D., Jo, Y., Hwang, G., Jo, Y., Smith, R., & Hwang, S. (2021) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114620 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ghorbani, B., Zendehboudi, S., Saady, N. M. C., Duan, X., & Albayati, T. M. (2023) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c01072 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
- Authors
- Khodaparast, S., Zare, V., & Mohammadkhani, F.
- Affiliations
- Urmia University of Technology (IR)
- University of Tabriz (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Zare, V.
- Venue
- Process Safety and Environmental Protection
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-03
- Volume
- 171
- Pages
- 28-37
- ISSN
- 0263-8762 (ISSN-L)
- 0957-5820
- OpenAlex
- W4313530453
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 2.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Process Safety and Environmental Protection (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Thermodynamic Systems and Engines
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
- Keywords
- hydrogen liquefaction, geothermal energy, Claude cycle, reverse Brayton cycle, organic Rankine cycle, thermoeconomic analysis, hydrogen supply chain, energy integration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
