Cited by 43Planetary Science and ExplorationMetal Extraction and BioleachingSpace Science and Extraterrestrial Life

Mining moon & mars with microbes: Biological approaches to extract iron from Lunar and Martian regolith

Open access
Volger, R., Pettersson, G.M., Brouns, S.J.J., Rothschild, L.J., Cowley, A., Lehner, B.A.E.·2020·Planetary and Space Science

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pss.2020.104850

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Shewanella oneidensis is capable of biomining iron from lunar and Martian simulant.

    “For example, the microorganism Shewanella onei­ densis has been shown to be capable of biomining iron from lunar and Martian simulant (Volger et al., 2020).”

    From Cyanobacteria and microalgae in supporting human habitation on Mars (2022) · cites this paper as Volger et al., 2020

    The Conclusion (page unavailable) identifies S. oneidensis as a promising iron-extraction candidate, but says the process estimates rely on literature data and require further experimental work. Section 3.2 (page unavailable) reports growth in Martian regolith simulant, not measured iron extraction; the paper does not show biomining from both lunar and Martian simulants. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Volger, R., Pettersson, G. M., Brouns, S. J. J., Rothschild, L. J., Cowley, A., & Lehner, B. A. E.
Affiliations
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
  • Ames Research Center (US)
  • European Astronaut Centre (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Cowley, A.
  • Lehner, B.A.E.
Venue
Planetary and Space Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
184
Pages
104850
ISSN
0032-0633 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3002041682
Cited by
43
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Planetary and Space Science (publishedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Keywords
in-situ resource utilization, lunar regolith, Martian regolith, Shewanella oneidensis, bioleaching, magnesium perchlorate, regolith simulants, water reuse, payback period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review