Cited by 10Spacecraft Dynamics and ControlSpace Satellite Systems and ControlSpacecraft Design and Technology

Small bodies non-uniform gravity field on-board learning through Hopfield Neural Networks

Open access
Pasquale, Andrea, Silvestrini, Stefano, Capannolo, Andrea, Lunghi, Paolo, Lavagna, Michèle·2022·Planetary and Space Science

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pss.2022.105425

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. J. Miller, A. Konopliv, P. Antreasian, J. Bordi, S. Chesley, C. Helfrich, W. Owen, T. Wang, B. Williams, D. Yeomans, D. Scheeres, Determination of shape, gravity, and rotational state of asteroid 433 eros, Icarus 155 (2002). doi:10.1006/icar.2001.6753. · DOI
  2. V. Pesce, S. Silvestrini, M. Lavagna, Radial basis function neural network aided adaptive extended Kalman filter for spacecraft relative navigation, Aerospace Science and Technology 96 (2020) 105527. doi:10.1016/j.ast.2019.105527. · DOI · Paper page
  3. S. Silvestrini, M. Lavagna, Neural-aided GNC reconfiguration algorithm for distributed space sys- tem: development and PIL test, Advances in Space Research 67 (5) (2021) 1490-1505. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2020.12.014. · DOI · Paper page
  4. S. Silvestrini, M. Lavagna, Neural-Based Predictive Control for Safe Autonomous Spacecraft Rela- tive Maneuvers, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics (2021). doi:10.2514/1.G005481. · DOI · Paper page
  5. S. Willis, D. Izzo, D. Hennes, Reinforcement learning for spacecraft maneuvering near small bodies, in: AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, 2016, pp. 14-18.
  6. Y. Wu, H. Wang, B. Zhang, K.-L. Du, Using radial basis function networks for function approxi- mation and classification, ISRN Applied Mathematics 2012 (03 2012). doi:10.5402/2012/324194. · DOI
  7. N. Harl, K. Rajagopal, S. N. Balakrishnan, Neural network based modified state observer for orbit uncertainty estimation, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 36 (4) (2013) 1194-1209. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.55711, doi:10.2514/1.55711. URL https://doi.org/10.2514/1.55711 · DOI
  8. A. Pasquale, Small bodies gravity field on-board learning and navigation, Master's thesis, Politec- nico di Milano, Milan (2019).
  9. R. A. Werner, Spherical harmonic coefficients for the potential of a constant-density polyhe- dron, Computers & Geosciences 23 (10) (1997) 1071 -1077. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0098-3004(97)00110-6. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098300497001106 · DOI
  10. D. Scheeres, Orbital motion in strongly perturbed environments: application to asteroid comet and planeraty satellite orbiters, Springer, 2012.
  11. Y. Takahashi, Gravity field characterization around small bodies, Ph.D. thesis, University of Col- orado Boulder (2013).
  12. H. Alonso, T. Mendonça, P. Rocha, Hopfield neural networks for on-line parameter estimation, Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society 22 (2009) 450-62.
  13. J. J. Hopfield, Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 81 (10) (1984) 3088-3092.
  14. Abe, Theories on the hopfield neural networks, in: International 1989 Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 1989, pp. 557-564 vol.1.
  15. M. Atencia, G. Joya, F. Sandoval, Hopfield neural networks for parametric identification of dynam- ical systems, Neural Processing Letters 21 (2005) 143-152.
  16. S. Silvestrini, A. Capannolo, M. Piccinin, M. Lavagna, J. Gil-Fernandez, Centralized Autonomous Relative Navigation of Multiple Spacecraft Around Small Bodies, in: AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, no. January, 2020, pp. 1-20. doi:10.2514/6.2020-1204. · DOI
  17. S. Silvestrini, A. Capannolo, M. Piccinin, M. Lavagna, J. G. Fernandez, Centralized autonomous relative navigation of multiple spacecraft around small bodies, The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences 1 PartF (2020). doi:10.2514/6.2020-1204. · DOI
  18. A. Capannolo, F. Ferrari, M. Lavagna, Families of bounded orbits near binary asteroid 65803 didymos, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 42 (1) (2019) 189-198.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pasquale, A., Silvestrini, S., Capannolo, A., Lunghi, P., & Lavagna, M.
Affiliations
Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Corresponding author
Pasquale, Andrea
Venue
Planetary and Space Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
212
Pages
105425
ISSN
0032-0633 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4206991072
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Planetary and Space Science (publishedVersion)
  • Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
Keywords
small bodies, Hopfield neural network, spherical harmonic expansion, CubeSat, parameter estimation, extended Kalman filter, computational efficiency, autonomous spacecraft

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review