Optical navigation for Lunar landing based on Convolutional Neural Network crater detector
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
15 of 31 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 2 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
State-of-the-art crater detection networks rely heavily on the U-Net architecture to identify landmarks by means of image segmentation.
“State of the art crater detection networks rely heavily on the so called U-Net architecture [34,35] to identify landmarks by means of image segmentation [20,21,22].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim4 of 5 sources checked- cites [34] 34. E. Shelhamer, J. Long, T. Darrell, Fully convolutional net- works for semantic segmentation, IEEE Transactions on Pat- tern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 39 (4) (2017) 640-651. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2572683. source
- cites [35] 35. O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, T. Brox, U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, in: N. Navab, J. Hornegger, W. M. Wells, A. F. Frangi (Eds.), Medical Image Computing and Computer- Assisted Intervention -MICCAI 2015, Springer International Publish- ing, Cham, 2015, pp. 234-241. source
The citation to SSD falls in the group attached to identifying landmarks by image segmentation, not the group attached to U-Net. The Model section (p. 3) says SSD detects object classes using bounding boxes and class scores; it does not describe landmark identification by image segmentation. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [20] 20. A. Silburt, M. Ali-Dib, C. Zhu, A. Jackson, D. Valencia, Y. Kissin, D. Tamayo, K. Menou, Lunar crater identification via deep learning, Icarus 317 (2019) 27-38. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2018.06.022. source
Section 2.3 (pp. 14–15) describes this crater-detection network as a custom U-Net that predicts a pixel-wise crater-ring mask, supporting its use as an example of segmentation-based detection. The paper does not establish the broader claim that state-of-the-art crater-detection networks generally rely heavily on U-Net; Section 2.4 (p. 16) also says a separate pipeline extracts crater positions and sizes from the predicted masks. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [21] 21. L. Downes, T. J. Steiner, J. P. How, Deep Learning Crater Detection for Lunar Terrain Relative Navigation, in: AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, 2020, pp. 1-12. doi:10.2514/6.2020-1838. source
- cites [22] 22. L. M. Downes, T. J. Steiner, J. P. How, Lunar terrain relative navi- gation using a convolutional neural network for visual crater detection, in: 2020 American Control Conference (ACC), 2020, pp. 4448-4453. doi:10.23919/ACC45564.2020.9147595. source
- Premisecitation
The Larsen measurement extrapolation method does not require knowledge about the measurement matrix and noise distribution matrix until time k.
“Larsen developed a measurement extrapolation method that does not require knowledge about the two matrices until time k [43].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] 43. T. D. Larsen, N. A. Andersen, O. Ravn, N. K. Poulsen, Incorporation of time delayed measurements in a discrete-time Kalman filter, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 4 (December) (1998) 3972-3977. doi:10.1109/cdc.1998.761918. source
Section 2 (Algorithm) describes Adam’s gradient-based optimization, not Larsen’s measurement extrapolation method. Searches for Larsen, measurement extrapolation, and the claimed timing of knowledge about the two matrices found no passage addressing the claim in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
A navigation system can be effective with a minimum frequency of trajectory update of 0.2 Hz.
“is known that such system can be effective with a minimum frequency of the trajectory update of 0.2 Hz [30,31].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [30] 30. P. Lunghi, R. Armellin, P. Di Lizia, M. Lavagna, et al., Semi-analytical adaptive guidance computation based on differential algebra for au- tonomous planetary landing, in: 26th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Me- chanics Meeting, Vol. 158, Univelt, 2016, pp. 2003-2022. source
Section 5.2.4 (p. 24) says the simulated guidance subsystem recalculates the trajectory every 5 seconds, equivalent to 0.2 Hz. The same section (p. 25) reports good overall performance despite uncertainties. The paper does not establish that 0.2 Hz is the minimum effective trajectory-update frequency. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [31] 31. P. Lunghi, M. Lavagna, R. Armellin, A semi-analytical guidance al- gorithm for autonomous landing, Advances in Space Research 55 (11) (2015) 2719-2738. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2015.02.022. source
Section 5.2.4 (p. 24) says the simulated guidance subsystem recalculates its trajectory every 5 seconds, equivalent to 0.2 Hz. Section 5.2.4 (p. 25) reports good performance in that simulation. The paper does not establish that 0.2 Hz is the minimum effective update frequency. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
The ODN crater detections are robust to disturbances or modifications of image quality due to Gaussian noise, shot noise, brightness levels, and different illumination conditions.
“the amount of crater detections that ODN-detector produces is robust to disturbances or modifications of the image quality due to Gaussian noise, shot noise, brightness levels, as well as different illumination conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 4 sources checked- cites [21] 21. L. Downes, T. J. Steiner, J. P. How, Deep Learning Crater Detection for Lunar Terrain Relative Navigation, in: AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, 2020, pp. 1-12. doi:10.2514/6.2020-1838. source
- cites [22] 22. L. M. Downes, T. J. Steiner, J. P. How, Lunar terrain relative navi- gation using a convolutional neural network for visual crater detection, in: 2020 American Control Conference (ACC), 2020, pp. 4448-4453. doi:10.23919/ACC45564.2020.9147595. source
Section VI (page unavailable) reports that LunaNet’s crater detections remain relatively consistent when images are 30% brighter or darker. The paper does not identify its detector as ODN or report tests of Gaussian noise, shot noise, or distinct illumination conditions; Section III mentions robustness to noise only generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [47] 47. L. M. Downes, T. J. Steiner, J. P. How, Lunar Terrain Rel- ative Navigation Using a Convolutional Neural Network for
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [16] 16. S. Wang, R. Clark, H. Wen, N. Trigoni, Deepvo: Towards end-to- end visual odometry with deep recurrent convolutional neural networks, in: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2017, pp. 2043-2050. doi:10.1109/ICRA.2017.7989236. source
The Training and Testing section (p. 5) describes DeepVO visual odometry, not ODN crater detection. The VO Results (p. 7) suggest augmenting future training data with noise, but do not report tests of Gaussian noise, shot noise, brightness, or illumination on crater detections. Searches for ODN crater detections and those image-quality conditions found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Preliminary tests performed with the U-Net architecture confirmed a computational burden potentially too high to achieve the target of at least one image processed per second on flight-representative hardware.
“Preliminary tests performed with such architecture confirmed this trend, with a computational burden potentially too high to achieve the target of at least one image processed per second on flight-representative hardware.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Each detected crater was matched to database ones, with a small percentage of false matches.
“results showed that each detected crater was matched to database ones, with a small percentage of false matches.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The average radius estimation error is approximately 15% with respect to the ground-truth.
“the average error is ∼15 % with respect to the ground-truth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The navigation yields an estimation error of approximately 200 m along the trajectory, both for vertical and horizontal error.
“The navigation yields an estimation error ∼ 200 m along the trajectory, both for vertical and horizontal error”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Crater detection delivers center localization error below approximately 3 px on average with respect to database ones.
“The crater detection delivers excellent center localization results (below ∼ 3 px) with respect to database ones, on average.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The ODN mean IoU on the test dataset is 0.7.
“Mean IoU 0.7”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Prototyping tests did not show any criticalities for the crater diameter over-estimation behavior.
“nevertheless the prototyping tests did not show any criticalities for such behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The ODN recall on the test dataset is 0.9.
“Recall 0.9”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The ODN network can successfully retrieve Moon craters in an image.
“The ODN network can successfully retrieve the Moon craters in an image.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
On the test set, the average correct match percentage is nearly 75% in each frame.
“On the test set, the average correct match percentage is nearly ∼75 % in each frame.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The ODN precision on the test dataset is 0.6.
“Precision 0.6”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The number of detected craters is in the order of approximately 50 detected craters for each frame.
“it is in the order of ∼ 50 detected craters for each frame.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The ODN F1-score on the test dataset is 0.7.
“F1-score 0.7”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Below an altitude of roughly 20 km, the database spatial density becomes lower than the captured FOV on the surface, resulting in very few craters to be matched.
“Below such altitude, the database spatial density becomes lower than the captured FOV on the surface resulting in very few craters to be matched.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
A detailed crater database is needed to perform lunar absolute navigation with the proposed architecture.
“A detailed crater database is needed to perform lunar absolute navigation with the proposed architecture.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
SSD combined with MobileNetV2 ensures computational efficiency and fast inferences on the embedded system thanks to optimized operations like depth-wise separable convolutions instead of basic convolutions.
“SDD combined with MobileNetV2 ensures computational efficiency and fast inferences on the embedded system thanks to the use of optimized operations like depth-wise separable convolutions [39] instead of basic convolutions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] 39. F. Chollet, Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separa- ble convolutions, in: 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vi- sion and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2017, pp. 1800-1807. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2017.195. source
- Study design and conductown data
The trained ODN detector has been qualitatively assessed with real Moon images.
“the trained ODN detector has been qualitatively assessed with real Moon images.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The planar trajectory assumption is not valid in a Lunar Fixed Frame due to the Moon's rotation.
“Nevertheless, the planar assumption in not valid in a Lunar Fixed Frame (LFF), due to the Moon rotation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The illumination conditions on the ground that the navigation system is expected to encounter are extremely variable, from the Sun slightly above the horizon in polar regions to 90° of Sun elevation close to the Lunar Equator.
“That implies that the illumination conditions on ground, especially the inclination of the Sun over the terrain, that the navigation system is expected to encounter are extremely variable, from the Sun slightly above the horizon in polar regions to 90° of Sun elevation close to the Lunar Equator.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The absolute location of identified features, i.e. craters, can be retrieved by matching detected craters to real database craters.
“In this way, the absolute location of identified features, i.e. craters, can be retrieved.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The degradation at the North Pole is due to the database filtering being performed on a spherical cap rather than a margined projected FOV.
“Such degradation is due to the fact that, in that area, the database filtering is performed on a spherical cap rather than a margined projected FOV.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The navigation system can meet the performance requirements.
“The sample scenario demonstrated that the navigation system can meet the performance requirements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The number of detected craters is deemed sufficient for the required accuracy.
“The number of detected craters is deemed as sufficient for the required accuracy”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This robustness to visual alterations supports the feasibility of CNN-based techniques as reliable navigation architectures that do not imply a high level of human input or tuning.
“This robustness to visual alterations supports the feasibility of CNN-based techniques as reliable navigation architectures that do not imply a high level of human input or tuning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The localization result provides the required performance for the subsequent matching task.
“This result provides the required performance for the subsequent matching task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The Myriad inference time of 0.4 s per image is compatible with the needs of autonomous navigation.
“a value compatible with the needs of autonomous navigation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
An end-to-end navigation cycle, including image processing, can be achieved at 1 Hz frequency.
“In this way, and end-to-end navigation cycle, including the image processing, can be achieved at 1 Hz frequency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Actual learning, enabled for higher layers only, tailors the network over the specific problem even with a relatively small dataset.
“Actual learning, enabled for higher layers only, tailors the network over the specific problem even with a relatively small dataset”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 27
- May combine two claims. 11
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Intel Myriad 2 VPU has already proven effective in flight.
“that has already proven effective in flight [12,13].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [12] 12. G. Giuffrida, L. Diana, F. de Gioia, G. Benelli, G. Meoni, M. Do- nati, L. Fanucci, Cloudscout: A deep neural network for on-board cloud detection on hyperspectral images, Remote Sensing 12 (14) (2020). doi:10.3390/rs12142205. source
The introduction says the Myriad 2–based algorithm “will be launched,” and Section 2 says the mission aims to demonstrate its usefulness in space. Section 5 adds that the approach still needs validation with HyperScout-2 data. The paper therefore describes planned in-flight demonstration, not effectiveness already proven in flight. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [13] 13. G. Mateo-Garcia, J. Veitch-Michaelis, L. Smith, S. V. Oprea, G. Schu- mann, Y. Gal, A. G. Baydin, D. Backes, Towards global flood mapping onboard low cost satellites with machine learning, Scientific Reports 11 (2021) 7249. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-86650-z. source
The Introduction says a satellite launched in September 2020 carries the Myriad 2 VPU and that a cloud-detection model was deployed on it. The Results report effective processing on a Myriad 2 chip connected to a Raspberry Pi, but do not establish that the VPU had proven effective in flight. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationObject detection algorithms using Deep Convolutional Networks have been proposed for UAV obstacle avoidance.
“Finally, object detection algorithms using Deep Convolutional Networks have been proposed for UAV obstacle avoidance in [26].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] 26. R. Opromolla, G. Fasano, Visual-based obstacle detec- tion and tracking, and conflict detection for small UAS sense and avoid, Aerospace Science and Technology (2021) 107167doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.107167. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationState-of-the-art crater detectors make use of Object Detection Networks and image segmentation.
“State of the art detectors make use of Object Detection Networks (ODN) [18,19] image segmentation [20,21,22].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 5 sources checked- cites [18] 18. E. Emami, T. Ahmad, G. Bebis, A. Nefian, T. Fong, Lunar crater de- tection via region-based convolutional neural networks, in: 49th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, 2018.
- cites [19] 19. E. Emami, T. Ahmad, G. Bebis, A. Nefian, T. Fong, Crater detection using unsupervised algorithms and convolutional neural networks, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 57 (8) (2019) 5373- 5383. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2019.2899122. source
- cites [20] 20. A. Silburt, M. Ali-Dib, C. Zhu, A. Jackson, D. Valencia, Y. Kissin, D. Tamayo, K. Menou, Lunar crater identification via deep learning, Icarus 317 (2019) 27-38. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2018.06.022. source
- cites [21] 21. L. Downes, T. J. Steiner, J. P. How, Deep Learning Crater Detection for Lunar Terrain Relative Navigation, in: AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, 2020, pp. 1-12. doi:10.2514/6.2020-1838. source
- cites [22] 22. L. M. Downes, T. J. Steiner, J. P. How, Lunar terrain relative navi- gation using a convolutional neural network for visual crater detection, in: 2020 American Control Conference (ACC), 2020, pp. 4448-4453. doi:10.23919/ACC45564.2020.9147595. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe adopted loss function replicates the original implementation by Liu et al. [36].
“The adopted loss function replicates the original implementation by Liu et al. [36]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] 36. W. Liu, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, C. Szegedy, S. Reed, C.-Y. Fu, A. C. Berg, SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector, in: B. Leibe, J. Matas, N. Sebe, M. Welling (Eds.), Computer Vision -ECCV 2016, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016, pp. 21-37. source
The paper’s title page (p. 1) identifies Sandler et al., not Liu et al., as its authors. Its ablation study (Section 6.4, p. 8) discusses MobileNetV2 architecture and performance, but the passages found for “Liu,” “loss function,” and “original implementation” do not address a loss function replicated from Liu et al. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThe conversion from single channel to RGB comes with null computational cost, because the information of the original channel is replicated 3 times.
“The conversion from single channel to RGB comes with null computational cost, for the information of the original channel is just replicated 3 times.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThe extrapolation method requires only two matrix multiplications at each time instant and storage of two variables whenever an image is acquired.
“the extrapolation method always requires only two matrix multiplications at each time instant and the storage of two variables any time an image is acquired.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenAn inference time on the network of 0.02 s per image on a Nvidia RTX.
“An inference time on the network of 0.02 s per image on a Nvidia RTX”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThe small peak present in the plot refers to the passage on the North Pole.
“The small peak present in the plot refers to the passage on the North Pole.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenCrater diameters are slightly over-estimated due to ODN post-processing.
“The crater diameters are slightly over-estimated due to ODN post-processing”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe wide range of Sun azimuth is applicable only for high latitudes close to the Poles.
“Actually, this wide range is applicable only for high latitudes close to the Poles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe loss function reached its minimum in 150 epochs.
“the loss function reached its minimum in 150 epochs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenNo data augmentation was applied or required.
“No data augmentation was applied or required.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenA fine-tuning of the original weights of the last two network branches was sufficient for converging to an optimal solution, while all other weights were maintained fixed at the original value.
“A fine-tuning of the original weights of the last two network branches was sufficient for converging to an optimal solution, while all the other weights were maintained fixed at the original value.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataTitan X GPU inference time is 57 frames per second with FP32 model precision.
“Titan X GPU (or 57 frame per seconds, with FP32 model precision) was preliminary assessed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe use of a pre-trained MobileNetV2 model allowed transfer learning to speed up the training process, achieving good results even with a relatively small training set.
“The use of a pre-trained MobileNetV2 model allowed to rely on transfer learning to speed-up the training process, achieving at the same time good results even with a relatively small training set like the one described in Section 3.1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOn Myriad hardware, with no code optimization, the inference time is 0.4 s per image (or 2.5 frames per second).
“On Myriad hardware, with no code optimization, the inference time increases to 0.4 s per image (or 2.5 frames per seconds)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premiseown dataThe U-Net architecture involves a huge number of trainable parameters, with a correspondingly high computational cost.
“Despite its high accuracy, such architecture involves a huge number of trainable parameters, with a computational cost accordingly high.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenTransfer learning allows to exploit the efficient set of low level features that pre-trained networks offer.
“Transfer learning allows to exploit the efficient set of low level features that pre-trained networks offer”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCraters database matching is typically exploited to retrieve the absolute pseudo-measurement.
“In particular, literature demonstrates that craters database matching is typically exploited to retrieve the absolute pseudo-measurement [10,11].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] 10. L. Singh, S. Lim, On lunar on-orbit vision-based navigation: Ter- rain mapping, feature tracking driven EKF, AIAA Guidance, Nav- igation and Control Conference and Exhibit (August) (2008) 1-18. doi:10.2514/6.2008-6834. source
- cites [11] 11. C. Xu, X. Huang, M. Li, D. Wang, Landmark database selec- tion for vision-aided inertial navigation in planetary landing missions, Aerospace Science and Technology 118 (2021) 107040. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.107040. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S1270963821005502 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe effect of the Moon's rotation corresponds to a maximum velocity in the Crossrange direction approximately equal to 4.5 m/s during the coasting phase.
“The effect of the Moon's rotation corresponds to a maximum velocity in the Crossrange direction approximately equal to 4.5 m s -1 during the coasting phase.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Study design and conductreasoningBy randomly varying environmental variables within the reported ranges, the dataset can cover the wide feature-space expected in the operational scenario.
“By doing so, the dataset can cover the wide feature-space that is expected in the operational scenario.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe lunar impact crater size and distribution has been extracted from [33].
“The lunar impact crater size and distribution has been extracted from [33].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] 33. G. Neukum, B. König, J. Arkani-Hamed, A study of lunar im- pact crater size-distributions, The Moon 12 (2) (1975) 201-229. doi:10.1007/BF00577878. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe navigation algorithm heavily relies on optical measurements.
“The navigation algorithm heavily relies on optical measurements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe synthetic DEM method allows a completely reliable ground-truth for crater position and size, whereas real DEMs contain craters not registered in databases and would not allow a completely reliable training set.
“This method allows to have a completely reliable ground-truth for the craters position and size, while real DEMs present craters that are not registered in databases and would not allow to build a completely reliable training set.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIn order to perform end-to-end navigation, craters detected by AI require to be matched with a database.
“In order to perform end-to-end navigation, craters detected by the AI requires to be matched with a database.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenDuring the coasting phase, the spacecraft travels half of the transfer orbit, covering 180 degrees in true anomaly.
“During the coasting phase, the S/C travels half of the transfer orbit, covering 180 degrees in true anomaly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn the South Pole landing scenario, the navigation system can encounter highly varying illumination conditions, with low Sun elevation angle and large shadow areas in the image.
“In such scenario, the navigation system can encounter highly varying illumination conditions, with low Sun elevation angle in the South Pole region and large shadow areas in the image.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: In Polar Regions, areas at relatively high altitude can experience continuous periods of illumination of several months, whereas some crater bottoms are always in shadow.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGeometrical or feature-based algorithms have been proposed for matching detected craters with a database.
“Geometrical [23,24] or feature-based [25] algorithms were proposed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [23] 23. W. Park, Y. Jung, H. Bang, J. Ahn, Robust crater triangle matching al- gorithm for planetary landing navigation, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 42 (2) (2019) 402-410. doi:10.2514/1.G003400. source
- cites [24] 24. J. qing Chen, P. yuan Cui, H. tao Cui, Automated detection and classifi- cation for craters based on geometric matching, in: J. C. Zarnecki, C. A. Nardell, R. Shu, J. Yang, Y. Zhang (Eds.), International Symposium on Photoelectronic Detection and Imaging 2011: Space Exploration Tech- nologies and Applications, Vol. 8196, International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, 2011, pp. 543 -548. doi:10.1117/12.901020. source
- cites [25] 25. W. Shao, J. Xie, L. Cao, J. Leng, B. Wang, Crater matching algorithm based on feature descriptor, Advances in Space Research 65 (1) (2020) 616-629. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2019.09.031. source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningSince the angle between the Moon rotation axis and the ecliptic is close to 90°, in the Polar Regions the topography plays a crucial role in determining illumination conditions.
“Since the angle between the Moon rotation axis and the ecliptic is close to 90°, in the Polar Regions the topography plays a crucial role in the determination of the illumination conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIncreasing the input size affects the inference time, which is potentially crucial for the next implementation of the algorithm into real hardware.
“increasing the input size affects the inference time, which is potentially crucial for the next implementation of the algorithm into real hardware.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn prior work, database matching is performed via a nearest neighbor approach, linking the output from the object detector to the navigation filter.
“In these papers, the database matching is performed via nearest neighbor approach, linking the output from the object detector to the navigation filter.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] 10. L. Singh, S. Lim, On lunar on-orbit vision-based navigation: Ter- rain mapping, feature tracking driven EKF, AIAA Guidance, Nav- igation and Control Conference and Exhibit (August) (2008) 1-18. doi:10.2514/6.2008-6834. source
- cites [11] 11. C. Xu, X. Huang, M. Li, D. Wang, Landmark database selec- tion for vision-aided inertial navigation in planetary landing missions, Aerospace Science and Technology 118 (2021) 107040. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.107040. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S1270963821005502 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningA possible motivation for the radius overestimation lies in the ODN post-processing stage, in which the crater radius is computed by assuming the bounding box inscribed into a circular shape.
“A possible motivation lies in the ODN post-processing stage, in which the crater radius is computed by assuming the bounding box inscribed into a circular shape.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The crater radius is computed by assuming the bounding box is inscribed into a circular shape.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTransfer learning considerably speeds up the training process, avoiding the burden to learn low-level features inherited from the pre-trained network.
“Transfer learning considerably speeds-up the training process, avoiding the burden to learn low-level features, inherited from the pre-trained network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationnone givenThe approximately 200 m estimation error is aligned with the expected performance at these relevant altitudes.
“which is aligned with the expected performance at these relevant altitudes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe achieved inference time makes the ODN a promising, and fast, alternative to the iterative, and slower, processes of template matching and thresholding required in classical techniques.
“the achieved inference time makes the ODN a promising, and fast, alternative to the iterative, and slower, processes of template matching and thresholding required in classical techniques [10].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] 10. L. Singh, S. Lim, On lunar on-orbit vision-based navigation: Ter- rain mapping, feature tracking driven EKF, AIAA Guidance, Nav- igation and Control Conference and Exhibit (August) (2008) 1-18. doi:10.2514/6.2008-6834. source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningThe illumination conditions on ground that the navigation system is expected to encounter are extremely variable, from Sun slightly above the horizon in polar regions to potentially straight illumination with 90° of Sun elevation close to the Lunar Equator.
“the illumination conditions on ground, especially the inclination of the Sun over the terrain, that the navigation system is expected to encounter are extremely variable, from the Sun slightly above the horizon in polar regions to potentially straight illumination with 90 • of Sun elevation close to the Lunar Equator.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe radius overestimation does not affect absolute navigation itself, but rather the matching process with the database.
“Nevertheless, this issue does not affect the absolute navigation itself, but rather the matching process with the database given that the KD-tree search is performed in the three dimensions [x, y, ρ].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Traditional vision-based navigation algorithms are highly affected by nonnominal conditions, which include illumination conditions and environmental uncertainties.
“Traditional vision-based navigation algorithms are highly affected from nonnominal conditions, which comprise illumination conditions and environmental uncertainties.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In Polar Regions, areas at relatively high altitude can experience continuous periods of illumination of several months, whereas some crater bottoms are always in shadow.
“In fact, areas at relatively high altitude can experience continuous periods of illumination (of several months), whereas some crater bottoms are always in shadow.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The proper behavior of a CNN model when performing inferences on real data is not assured when the training is based on synthetic data.
“One of the major concerns with CNN and AI in general is their generalization ability, and the proper behavior of the model when performing inferences on real data is not assured when the training is based on synthetic data.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Beyond certain frequencies, the gain in performance due to faster trajectory update becomes irrelevant.
“Beyond certain frequencies the gain in performance due to the faster update becomes irrelevant.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The inclination of the initial parking orbit can be tuned to match the latitude of the target landing site, achieving a planar trajectory in the inertial reference frame.
“in this work is assumed that the inclination of the initial PO can be tuned to match the latitude of the target landing site achieving a planar trajectory (in the inertial reference frame).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
A camera with 40° Field Of View (FOV) and a 1024 × 1024 pixels sensor is the main navigation sensor.
“A camera with 40° Field Of View (FOV) and a 1024 × 1024 pixels sensor 177 is assumed as main navigation sensor.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The navigation camera maintains a nominal nadir pointing.
“the navigation camera is assumed to maintain a nominal nadir pointing”
The authors state this as an assumption.
No particular constraints bound the Sun inclination to a specific range.
“No particular constraints that bound the Sun inclination to a specific range (like the execution of the whole landing maneuver close to the lunar terminator) are assumed.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Only the Moon gravitational pull is included in the translational dynamics.
“Since the whole maneuver takes place in close proximity to the lunar ground, only the Moon gravitational pull is included in the translational dynamics.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The crater radius is computed by assuming the bounding box is inscribed into a circular shape.
“in which the crater radius is computed by assuming the bounding box inscribed into a circular shape.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
A standard deviation of 1% of the current altitude for altimeter noise reflects the actual behavior of the laser altimeter technology.
“A standard deviation of 1 % of the current altitude is assumed, reflecting the actual behavior of the laser altimeter technology.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Velocity Jacobian has twice the stated Coriolis coefficient
MinorEquation 4 contains one V ∧ Ω term. Differentiating that term with respect to velocity gives off-diagonal coefficients of ±Ω, but Equation 7 gives ±2Ω.
“V - GM R 3 R + V ∧ Ω + Ω ∧ R ∧ Ω + U”
“F V V = 0 2Ω 0 -2Ω 0 0 0 0 0 (7”
Navigation reference frame is described as both inertial and rotating
MinorThe absolute-navigation state is said to be measured in an inertial frame fixed to the Moon. Elsewhere, the paper identifies its lunar-fixed frame as non-inertial because it rotates with the Moon.
“The absolute navigation task requires the determination of the complete state, i.e. position and velocity with respect to the inertial system fixed to the Moon.”
“where GM is the gravitational parameter of the Moon and Ω = 391 [0, 0, Ω] is the angular velocity of the Moon rotation about its own axis, 392 expressed in the LFF, which coincides with the angular velocity of the non-393 inertial reference frame.”
Cites
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404 · see citing works
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · see citing works
(2016) · Cited by 31,590 · see citing works
MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks
Sandler, M., Howard, A., Zhu, M., Zhmoginov, A., & Chen, L.-C. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00474 · Cited by 28,755 · see citing works
SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector
Liu, W., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Szegedy, C., Reed, S., Fu, C.-Y., & Berg, A. C. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2 · Cited by 22,128 · see citing works
Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutions
Chollet, F. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.195 · Cited by 20,380 · see citing works
Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Shelhamer, E., Long, J., & Darrell, T. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2572683 · Cited by 11,898 · see citing works
2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
(2017) · doi:10.1109/cvpr35066.2017 · Cited by 7,281 · see citing works
2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
(2018) · doi:10.1109/cvpr40276.2018 · Cited by 4,769 · see citing works
Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context
Lin, T.-Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Bourdev, L., Girshick, R., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Zitnick, C. L., & Dollár, P. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1405.0312 · Cited by 2,579 · see citing works
2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
(2018) · doi:10.1109/icra36916.2018 · Cited by 1,368 · see citing works
Deepvo: towards end-to-end visual odometry with deep recurrent convolutional neural networks
Wang, S., Clark, R., Wen, H., & Trigoni, N. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2017.7989236 · Cited by 970 · see citing works
Learning Less is More - 6D Camera Localization via 3D Surface Regression
Brachmann, E., & Rother, C. (2017) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.10228 · Cited by 459
Learning Less is More - 6D Camera Localization via 3D Surface Regression
Brachmann, E., & Rother, C. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00489 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
27th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting
Joffre, É., Zamaro, M., Silva, N., Marcos, A., Simplício, P., & Richardson, B. (2017) · Cited by 366 · see citing works
2021 American Control Conference (ACC)
(2021) · doi:10.23919/acc50511.2021 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
49th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2018
Prockter, L. M., names, nr, & Stansbery, E. K. (2018) · Lunar and Planetary Institute eBooks · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Improved Gravity Field of the Moon from Lunar Prospector
Konopliv, A. S., Binder, A. B., Hood, L. L., et al. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5382.1476 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2022
Selvan, R., Bhagwat, N., Anthony, L. F. W., Kanding, B., & Dam, E. B. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16443-9 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Robbins, S. J. (2019) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/2018je005592 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Lunar crater identification via deep learning
Silburt, A., Ali-Dib, M., Zhu, C., Jackson, A., Valencia, D., Kissin, Y., Tamayo, D., & Menou, K. (2019) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2018.06.022 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Incorporation of time delayed measurements in a discrete-time Kalman filter
Larsen, T. D., Andersen, N. A., Ravn, O., et al. (2002) · Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision & Control, including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes · doi:10.1109/cdc.1998.761918 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
A study of lunar impact crater size-distributions
Neukum, G., K�nig, B., & Arkani-Hamed, J. (1975) · The Moon · doi:10.1007/bf00577878 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Towards global flood mapping onboard low cost satellites with machine learning
Mateo-Garcia, G., Veitch-Michaelis, J., Smith, L., Oprea, S. V., Schumann, G., Gal, Y., Baydin, A. G., & Backes, D. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-86650-z · Cited by 202 · see citing works
AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit
(2008) · doi:10.2514/mgnc08 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Cloudscout: a deep neural network for on-board cloud detection on hyperspectral images
Giuffrida, G., Diana, L., de Gioia, F., Benelli, G., Meoni, G., Donati, M., & Fanucci, L. (2020) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs12142205 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Pesce, V., Silvestrini, S., & Lavagna, M. (2020) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2019.105527 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Self-citationVision-aided inertial navigation for pinpoint planetary landing
Li, S., Cui, P., & Cui, H. (2007) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2007.04.006 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
State estimation for distributed systems with sensing delay
Alexander, H. L. (1991) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.44843 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Deep Learning Crater Detection for Lunar Terrain Relative Navigation
Downes, L., Steiner, T. J., & How, J. P. (2020) · AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum · doi:10.2514/6.2020-1838 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Visual-based obstacle detection and tracking, and conflict detection for small UAS sense and avoid
Opromolla, R., & Fasano, G. (2021) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2021.107167 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Deep Learning for Autonomous Lunar Landing
Furfaro, R., Bloise, I., Orlandelli, M., Lizia, P. D., Topputo, F., & Linares, R. (2018) · Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationCrater detection using unsupervised algorithms and convolutional neural networks
Emami, E., Ahmad, T., Bebis, G., Nefian, A., & Fong, T. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2019.2899122 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
On Lunar On-Orbit Vision-Based Navigation: Terrain Mapping, Feature Tracking Driven EKF
Singh, L., & Lim, S. (2008) · AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit · doi:10.2514/6.2008-6834 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Guidance, navigation and control for 6DOF rendezvous in Cislunar multi-body environment
Colagrossi, A., Pesce, V., Bucci, L., Colombi, F., & Lavagna, M. (2021) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2021.106751 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationNeural-based predictive control for safe autonomous spacecraft relative maneuvers
Silvestrini, S., & Lavagna, M. (2021) · Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/1.g005481 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationLunar Terrain Relative Navigation Using a Convolutional Neural Network for Visual Crater Detection
Downes, L. M., Steiner, T. J., & How, J. P. (2020) · 2020 American Control Conference (ACC) · doi:10.23919/acc45564.2020.9147595 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Scientific Satellite and Moon-Based Earth Observation for Global Change
Guo, H., Fu, W., & Liu, G. (2019) · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8031-0 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Robust crater triangle matching algorithm for planetary landing navigation
Park, W., Jung, Y., Bang, H., & Ahn, J. (2019) · Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/1.g003400 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
A semi-analytical guidance algorithm for autonomous landing
Lunghi, P., Lavagna, M., & Armellin, R. (2015) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2015.02.022 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationLearning Pose Estimation for UAV Autonomous Navigation and Landing Using Visual-Inertial Sensor Data
Baldini, F., Anandkumar, A., & Murray, R. M. (2020) · Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference · doi:10.23919/acc45564.2020.9147400 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Neural-aided GNC reconfiguration algorithm for distributed space system: development and PIL test
Silvestrini, S., & Lavagna, M. (2021) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2020.12.014 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationColagrossi, A., & Lavagna, M. (2018) · CEAS Space Journal · doi:10.1007/s12567-017-0174-4 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationLearning Pose Estimation for UAV Autonomous Navigation and Landing Using Visual-Inertial Sensor Data
Baldini, F., Anandkumar, A., & Murray, R. (2019) · American Control Conference · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.04527 · Cited by 19
Characterisation of 6DOF natural and controlled relative dynamics in cislunar space
Colombi, F., Colagrossi, A., & Lavagna, M. (2022) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.01.017 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationLandmark database selection for vision-aided inertial navigation in planetary landing missions
Xu, C., Huang, X., Li, M., & Wang, D. (2021) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2021.107040 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Crater matching algorithm based on feature descriptor
Shao, W., Xie, J., Cao, L., Leng, J., & Wang, B. (2020) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2019.09.031 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Neural Network Approach to Crater Detection for Lunar Terrain Relative Navigation
Downes, L. M., Steiner, T. J., & How, J. P. (2021) · Journal of Aerospace Information Systems · doi:10.2514/1.i010884 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Comellini, A., Casu, D., Zenou, E., Dubanchet, V., & Espinosa, C. (2020) · Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/1.g005034 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
(2019) · Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Silvestrini, S., & Lavagna, M. R. (2020) · AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum · doi:10.2514/6.2020-1918 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationSmall bodies non-uniform gravity field on-board learning through Hopfield Neural Networks
Pasquale, A., Silvestrini, S., Capannolo, A., Lunghi, P., & Lavagna, M. (2022) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2022.105425 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citation(2018) · Lunar and Planetary Science Conference · Cited by 10 · see citing works
The Gravity Field of the Moon from the Lunar Prospector Mission
Konopliv, A. S., Kucinskas, A. B., SJOGREN, W. L., et al. (1998) · Science · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Automated detection and classification for craters based on geometric matching
Chen, J.-Q., Cui, P.-Y., & Cui, H.-T. (2011) · SPIE Proceedings · doi:10.1117/12.901020 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Lunghi, P., Armellin, R., Lizia, P. D., et al. (2016) · Open Research (University of Surrey) · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationFrontiers of Moon-Based Earth Observation
Guo, H., Fu, W., & Liu, G. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8031-0_17 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep Learning and Artificial Neural Networks for Spacecraft Dynamics, Navigation and Control
Silvestrini, S., & Lavagna, M. R. (2022) · Drones · doi:10.3390/drones6100270 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationA flexible deep learning crater detection scheme using Segment Anything Model (SAM)
Giannakis, I., Bhardwaj, A., Sam, L., & Leontidis, G. (2023) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2023.115797 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Robust spacecraft relative pose estimation via CNN-aided line segments detection in monocular images
Bechini, M., Gu, G., Lunghi, P., & Lavagna, M. (2024) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.11.049 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationLatorre, F., Spiller, D., Sasidharan, S. T., Basheer, S., & Curti, F. (2023) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2023.115434 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Capra, L., Brandonisio, A., & Lavagna, M. R. (2022) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2022.11.048 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationBrandonisio, A., Capra, L., & Lavagna, M. R. (2023) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2023.07.007 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationHigh performance lunar constellation for navigation services to Moon orbiting users
Zanotti, G., Ceresoli, M., Pasquale, A., Prinetto, J., & Lavagna, M. R. (2023) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2023.03.032 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationFan, L., Yuan, J.-B., Zha, K.-L., & Wang, X. (2022) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs14205225 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“Some works [28,29] have used CNN feature extraction and standard image processing technologies to detect and match the observed craters, which were used as visual landmark measurements by the navigation filter.”
MethodA review on deep learning-based automated lunar crater detection
Chaini, C., & Jha, V. K. (2024) · Earth Science Informatics · doi:10.1007/s12145-024-01396-2 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Implicit Extended Kalman Filter for Optical Terrain Relative Navigation Using Delayed Measurements
Silvestrini, S., Piccinin, M., Zanotti, G., Brandonisio, A., Lunghi, P., & Lavagna, M. R. (2022) · Aerospace · doi:10.3390/aerospace9090503 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“The time scale takes the PDI as origin, while downrange is assumed to be 0 at the landing site [1].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationPredicting uncertainty in vision-based satellite pose estimation using deep evidential regression
Dixon, T. O., Giles, S. A., & Gorodetsky, A. A. (2025) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2025.110055 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
ShadowNav: Autonomous Global Localization for Lunar Navigation in Darkness
(2024) · doi:10.1109/tfr.2024.3462391 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Notably, Silburt et al. [40] and Silvestrini et al. [41] use neural networks to match craters; however, these require a well-labeled library to be known in advance for template matching.”
BackgroundDriver, T., Skinner, K. A., Dor, M., & Panagiotis Tsiotras, B. (2023) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.01.009 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Wu, Z., & Margarita, S. (2024) · Natural and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.28978/nesciences.1567736 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Tonasso, R., Tataru, D., Rauch, H., et al. (2024) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.02.006 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“In the case of lunar missions, however, we deemed interacting with the ground a major drawback for the following reasons: 1) its negative impact on potential surface and subsurface volatiles and other valuable elements present within the region of influence of the propulsion system [51, 52], 2) having to cope with exc…”
BackgroundAutonomous and Earth-Independent Orbit Determination for a Lunar Navigation Satellite System
Critchley-Marrows, J. J. R., Wu, X., Kawabata, Y., et al. (2024) · Aerospace · doi:10.3390/aerospace11020153 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Zhong, Z., Lai, J., Zhong, Y., Xu, Y., & Cui, F. (2025) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2025.116483 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Robust and efficient single-CNN-based spacecraft relative pose estimation from monocular images
Bechini, M., & Lavagna, M. R. (2025) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2025.04.016 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationReview of Autonomous Optical Navigation for Deep Space Exploration
Ma, Y., Gu, C., Jiang, J., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2025.3541703 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“To address this, Silvestrini et al. [182] developed a crater detection algorithm for remote sensing imagery utilizing a single shot detector (SSD).”
Mars landing feedback guidance for non-concave trajectory construction
Gong, Y., Guo, Y., Li, D., et al. (2023) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2023.108303 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Energy efficiency analysis of Spiking Neural Networks for space applications
Lunghi, P., Silvestrini, S., Dold, D., Meoni, G., Hadjiivanov, A., & Izzo, D. (2025) · Astrodynamics · doi:10.1007/s42064-024-0256-y · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“…early detection of potential failures or catastrophic events [10], feature detection and tracking in Guidance, Navigation, and Control systems [11–14], pre-processing of collected data by Earth Obser-vation satellites to mitigate bandwidth requirements by filtering out invalid or corrupted data,…”
Self-citationNeural Network-Aided Optical Navigation for Precise Lunar Descent Operations
Andolfo, S., Genova, A., Buonomo, F. V., Gargiulo, A. M., Awag, M. E., Federici, P., Teodori, R., Grassa, R. L., Re, C., & Cremonese, G. (2025) · Aerospace · doi:10.3390/aerospace12030195 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Tahir, H., Jabbarpour, M. R., Vo, Q. B., Kowalczyk, R., Barr, J., & Bessell, T. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3639551 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“For example, thermodynamic models of propulsion systems can provide plausibility checks for anomaly detections related to thruster performance [152], [153], [154], reducing false positives caused by sensor noise or transient environmental factors [155], [156], [157].”
A Dual-Mode Approach for Vision-Based Navigation in a Lunar Landing Scenario
Ostrogovich, L., Prete, R. D., Tomasicchio, G., Longépé, N., & Renga, A. (2024) · IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw63382.2024.00673 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Mortensen, D., & Withee, S. (2023) · Proceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting (Online)/Proceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting (CD-ROM) · doi:10.33012/2023.19283 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Finite-time 6-DOF tracking control for rigid spacecraft with relative velocity constraints
Wang, L., Gong, Y., Sun, Y., & Guo, Y. (2025) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2025.09.024 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Chen, Y., Wei, G., Zhang, H., Lu, J., & Pang, F. (2025) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs17091589 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Optical Image Generation Through Digital Terrain Models for Autonomous Lunar Navigation
Ceresoli, M., Silvestrini, S., & Lavagna, M. R. (2025) · Aerospace · doi:10.3390/aerospace12020092 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationOliveira, S., Nedoma, J., Martinek, R., & Marques, C. (2025) · Opto-Electronic Advances · doi:10.29026/oea.2025.250036 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Machine Learning in Space: Surveying the Robustness of On-Board ML Models to Radiation
Lange, K., Fontana, F., Rossi, F., Varile, M., & Apruzzese, G. (2024) · IEEE Space Computing Conference (SCC) · doi:10.1109/scc61854.2024.00012 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“We also mention some orthogonal applications of ML, e.g., “federated learning” approaches [27]; or for missions that go beyond the Earth orbit, such as using ML to pinpoint landing on the Moon [28], or for managing the autonomy of CubeSats in deep space [29].”
Self-citationPrecise orbit determination through a joint analysis of optical and radiometric data
Andolfo, S., Genova, A., Federici, P., et al. (2024) · doi:10.1109/isparo60631.2024.10687705 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“In this work, a supervised transfer learning approach was adopted: a pre-trained object detector (based on the state-of-the-art YOLO architecture [14]) was re-trained on a custom dataset (including ground truth images and labels) to learn the new crater detection task [15].”
MethodAccurate semantic segmentation of small-body craters for navigation
Li, S., Gu, T., Liu, Y., & Shao, W. (2024) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.03.012 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Exploiting Lunar Navigation Constellation for GNC Enhancement in Landing Missions
Zanotti, G., Ceresoli, M., & Lavagna, M. R. (2023) · Aerospace · doi:10.3390/aerospace10100850 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationSpiller, D., Carbone, A., Latorre, F., & Curti, F. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Metrology for eXtended Reality, Artificial Intelligence and Neural Engineering (MetroXRAINE) · doi:10.1109/metroxraine54828.2022.9967688 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“However, there already other studies where off-the-shelf models have been successfully deployed for on-board autonomous operations [18].”
Lin, X., Li, T., Hua, B., Li, L., & Zhao, C. (2025) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2025.3633611 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“D terrain models or external beacons, significantly reducing onboard computational demands [8], [9].”
Hybrid Lunar Satellite and Cooperative Surface Navigation: A Distributed Estimation Perspective
Pöhlmann, R., Gerhards, J. P., Zhang, S., Staudinger, E., & Becker, C. (2025) · IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO) · doi:10.1109/aero63441.2025.11068411 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“For landing, navigation can be provided based on known points on the lunar surface using cameras or lidar [3], [4].”
Feng, Y., Tong, X., Xu, X., Jin, Y., Xie, H., Feng, Y., Wang, C., & Xiao, C. (2025) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2025.3594170 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Lunar Ejecta Pattern Detection and Analysis Using Faster R-CNN and GAN Augmentation
Ghadekar, P. P., Rathad, C., Jangral, S., Unde, R., Mali, A., & Karande, A. (2024) · International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (Confluence) · doi:10.1109/confluence60223.2024.10463225 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“In conclusion, they describe a vision-based navigation strategy that makes use of CNNs and data fusion approaches to enhance the precision and dependability of lunar landing in difficult circumstances [10].”
BackgroundCNN-Based Local Features for Navigation Near an Asteroid
Knuuttila, O., Kestilä, A., & Kallio, E. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3358021 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been extensively used in studies to automatically detect and describe craters for use as landmarks in navigation [11], [12], [13], [14].”
MethodPeñarroya, P., Centuori, S., Sanjurjo-Rivo, M., & Hermosín, P. (2023) · Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s10569-023-10140-9 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Yang, B., Wang, T., Li, B., et al. (2025) · Aerospace · doi:10.3390/aerospace12090760 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Controls for Space: a perspective to 2030s and beyond II
Mammarella, M., D’Amico, S., Pavone, M., Linares, R., Acheson, M. J., Ankersen, F., Sasaki, T., Ancona, E., DiMatteo, J., Spiegel, I. A., et al. (2025) · Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference · doi:10.23919/acc63710.2025.11107419 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“…Neural Networks (CNNs) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks could be employed in image-based navigation for planetary landings, lunar descent, and autonomous rendezvous scenarios, offering robust state estimation under varying lighting and surface conditions as demonstrated in [49]–[51].”
Self-citationLatorre, F., Spiller, D., & Curti, F. (2023) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-25755-1_8 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Huang, J., He, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, X., & Xu, L. (2026) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs18101555 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Silvestrini, S. (2026) · Astrodynamics · doi:10.1007/s42064-025-0282-4 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have demonstrated its utility in various tasks in the space domain, including navigation and formation flying guidance and navigation [5–10].”
Self-citationSong, J., Aouf, N., Rondao, D., Honvault, C., Mansilla, L. A., & Yang, Q. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · doi:10.1109/taes.2025.3580700 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Silvestrini et al. [23] used an object detection network to extract observed craters, followed by image processing algorithms for pseudomeasurements.”
A Crater-based Optical Navigation Approach for Precise Spacecraft Localization
Andolfo, S., Genova, A., Awag, M. E., Buonomo, F. V., Federici, P., & Teodori, R. (2025) · IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO) · doi:10.1109/aero63441.2025.11068689 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“A wide range of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) techniques have recently been proposed to extract craters from images or elevation maps, including semantic segmentation ( e.g. , [13], [4], [14]) and object detection ( e.g. , [15], [16], [17]) networks.”
RSO-Based Autonomous Navigation for Satellites with Optical Observation
Yao, Y., & Ji, H. (2025) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-2260-3_25 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Vision Based Lunar Landing Using RC64 Rad Hard DSP/ML Manycore Processor
Ginosar, R., Aviely, P., Shor, Y., Leiter, N., Mor, R., Mintz, S., & Kouperman, V. (2023) · European Data Handling & Data Processing Conference (EDHPC) · doi:10.23919/edhpc59100.2023.10396521 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“LeCun applies Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to stereo matching [17], and Silvestrini et al. have applied CNN to Lunar landing [18].”
MethodShort-Arc Horizon-Based Optical Navigation by Total Least-Squares Estimation
Deng, H., Wang, H., Liu, Y., et al. (2023) · Aerospace · doi:10.3390/aerospace10040371 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Silvestrini, S., Cassinis, L. P., Hinz, R., González-Arjona, D., Tipaldi, M., Visconti, P., Corradino, F., Pesce, V., & Colagrossi, A. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-90916-7.00015-9 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationChen, Y., Zhang, H., Lu, J., & Wei, G. (2026) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs18172950
Yan, Q., Guo, Y., & Zeng, X. (2026) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2026.113462
Onboard Optical Position Estimation for Autonomous Cislunar Navigation via Reinforcement Learning
Violino, E., Federici, L., Scorsoglio, A., Ghilardi, L., Topputo, F., & Furfaro, R. (2026) · Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets · doi:10.2514/1.a36615
A two-stage offline-online visual navigation framework for high-precision lunar polar landing
Wang, S., Zhifa, C. H. E. N., Guizhen, Y. U., et al. (2026) · Chinese Journal of Aeronautics · doi:10.1016/j.cja.2026.104149
Chen, Y., Wei, G.-F., Zhang, H., et al. (2025) · Journal of Deep Space of Exploration · doi:10.3724/j.issn.2096-9287.2025.20250044
Labò, S. G., Silvestrini, S., & Lavagna, M. R. (2025) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2025.09.048
Self-citationOptical Camera Characterization for Feature-Based Navigation in Lunar Orbit
Federici, P., Genova, A., Andolfo, S., Ciambellini, M., Teodori, R., & Torrini, T. (2025) · Aerospace · doi:10.3390/aerospace12050374
Consolidated extraterrestrial planetary crater detection using SAM (segment anything model)
Biju, A. K., Vasu, V. P., & Krishnan, S. (2025) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0247426
Optimizing Aerospace Missions with Convolutional Neural Networks: Innovations and Advantages
Chen, P., Padun, Y., & Du, J. (2024) · International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI) · doi:10.1109/icsai65059.2024.10893852
“Research shows that CNNs significantly improve navigation accuracy in complex situations, such as detecting and tracking landmarks for precise landings and close-in operations such as active debris removal and satellite maintenance[8][9][10].”
A Deep Learning Biomimetic Milky Way Compass
Tao, Y., LUCAS, M. A., Perera, A. G., Teague, S., McIntyre, T., Ogunwa, T., Warrant, E. J., & Chahl, J. (2024) · Biomimetics · doi:10.3390/biomimetics9100620
“In addition to Earth observation (EO) navigation applications, there are also some studies in the field of space exploration that use DL-based vision-relative methods for navigation and landing [33–35].”
BackgroundMulti-Type Feature Fusion Visual Navigation for Asteroid LandingPreprint
Xiu, W., Zhu, S., & Cui, P. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4823221
Chen, X., Zhou, G., Huang, Z., & Xie, S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2024.3478807
“Given the visual feature F v ∈ R H × W × C obtained from Section III-A, URLEV constructs a TT layer which has specialized cores G 1 [ 1 ] , G 2 , and G 3 [ 1 ] for extraction.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCNN-based local features for navigation near an asteroidPreprint
Knuuttila, O., Kestilä, A., & Kallio, E. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.11156
“Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been extensively used in studies to automatically detect and describe craters for use as landmarks in navigation [11], [12], [13], [14].”
MethodTonasso, R., Tataru, D., Rauch, H., et al. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.11013
“In the case of lunar missions, however, we deemed interacting with the ground a major drawback for the following reasons: 1) its negative impact on potential surface and subsurface volatiles and other valuable elements present within the region of influence of the propulsion system [51, 52], 2) having to cope with exc…”
Background
- Authors
- Silvestrini, S., Piccinin, M., Zanotti, G., Brandonisio, A., Bloise, I., Feruglio, L., Lunghi, P., Lavagna, M., & Varile, M.
- Affiliations
- Politecnico di Milano (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Silvestrini, Stefano
- ORCID
- Venue
- Aerospace Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-04
- Volume
- 123
- Pages
- 107503
- ISSN
- 1270-9638 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4221084397
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 6.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Aerospace Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- European Space Agency
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Inertial Sensor and Navigation
- Keywords
- lunar landing, visual navigation, convolutional neural networks, crater detection, object detection, extended Kalman filter, time delay measurement, powered descent, feature extraction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review