Cited by 45Circadian rhythm and melatoninTreatment of Major DepressionPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of bright light and high-density negative air ions for treatment of seasonal affective disorder.

Flory, Randall, Ametepe, Joseph, Bowers, Bonnie·2010·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

This study, conducted over the course of 5 years, assessed the antidepressant efficacy of two active treatments, bright white light and high-density negative ions, and the efficacy of two placebo treatments, dim red light and low-density negative ions, for Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD). In a controlled laboratory setting, 73 women with SAD were exposed to one of the four treatment conditions over 12 consecutive days. Pretreatment expectation ratings did not significantly differ among the four treatment groups; however, expectation scores and treatment benefits were positively related. Over the course of treatment, subjects in all four groups showed significant score decreases on the Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-Seasonal Affective Disorder Version-Self Rating (SIGH-SAD-SR) and on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). For raw scale scores, neither main effects of treatment nor interactions between treatment and time were significant. When remission outcome criteria were used, bright white light was significantly more effective than any of the other three treatments, and exposure to high-density negative ions was more effective than either of the two placebo conditions, although the difference was not significant.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.08.011

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flory, R., Ametepe, J., & Bowers, B.
Affiliations
Hollins University (US)
Corresponding author
Flory, Randall
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
177
Issue
1-2
Pages
101-108
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060591642
Cited by
45
References
60
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
seasonal affective disorder, negative air ions, antidepressant efficacy, placebo effect, dim red light, treatment expectations, depression remission, women
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Air Ionization, Analysis of Variance, Female, Humans, Light, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Phototherapy, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Placebo Effect, Chi-Square Distribution, Seasonal Affective Disorder, Treatment Outcome, Photoperiod, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review