Cited by 97Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health Treatment and AccessMental Health and Psychiatry

The relationship between internalized stigma, negative symptoms and social functioning in schizophrenia: The mediating role of self-efficacy

Hill, Kimberley, Startup, Mike·2013·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

The broad aim of the present study was to gain a greater understanding of the processes that contribute to negative symptoms and social functioning in schizophrenia. More specifically, a theoretical model was proposed predicting that self-efficacy would mediate the relationship between internalized stigma and both negative symptoms and social functioning in schizophrenia. Initial analyses revealed that all variables were correlated. Specifically, internalized stigma was strongly correlated with negative symptoms, social functioning and self-efficacy. Furthermore, self-efficacy was strongly related to negative symptoms and moderately associated with social functioning. Further analyses however did not support the mediational role of self-efficacy. The theoretical and clinical implications of the findings, together with recommendations for future research, are outlined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.09.056

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-perception factors such as self-esteem, self-efficacy and internalised stigma are associated with poor social functioning in psychosis.

    “Self‐perception factors included self‐esteem (Lysaker et al. 2007), self‐efficacy (Chang et al. 2017) and internalised stigma (Hill and Startup 2013; Lysaker et al. 2007).”

    From Social Functioning Interventions in Psychosis: A Systematic Review. (2025) · cites this paper as Hill and Startup 2013

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hill, K., & Startup, M.
Affiliations
University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Startup, Mike
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
206
Issue
2-3
Pages
151-157
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022195535
Cited by
97
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
schizophrenia, self-stigma, negative symptoms, social functioning, self-efficacy, mediation, stigma
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Self Concept, Social Adjustment, Social Behavior, Stereotyping, Self Efficacy, Young Adult, Social Stigma, Anhedonia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review