Cited by 22Mental Health Treatment and AccessMedia Influence and HealthFilm in Education and Therapy

The film festival “AUSNAHME|ZUSTAND” (State of Emergency)—Do feature films and documentaries on mental health reduce stigma and influence help-seeking attitudes?

Conrad, Ines, Schulze, Beate, Corrieri, Sandro, Heider, Dirk, Schomerus, Georg, Riedel-Heller, Steffi G.·2014·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

The study aims at evaluating the impact of the Germany-wide film festival “AUSNAHME|ZUSTAND” on social distance and help-seeking attitudes of the adolescent audience. The festival, on the subject of mental health, was staged for the second time, aiming to give a podium to the topic mental health and to inform and entertain an adolescent audience that has not been in close contact with the subject before. A pre-post test was carried out to look for the effect of feature films and documentaries on social distance of the audience towards people with mental illness and on the change in help-seeking attitudes. A total of 532 young people with a mean age of 15.6 were questioned during the film festival in Leipzig. As the results show, the effect on the viewers׳ social distance and their help-seeking attitudes strongly depend on the content of the feature films and documentaries. Two films improved attitudes – one both social distance and help-seeking, one only help-seeking. One film increased social distance, and two films did not affect either outcome. Age, gender, and knowing someone with mental health problems also turned out to be decisive factors influencing the development of social distance and help-seeking attitudes. Feature films or documentaries about mental illness can reduce social distance or influence help-seeking attitudes, but effects strongly depend on the particular film.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.09.006

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conrad, I., Schulze, B., Corrieri, S., Heider, D., Schomerus, G., & Riedel-Heller, S. G.
Affiliations
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • Universität Greifswald (DE)
Corresponding author
Conrad, Ines
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
220
Issue
3
Pages
1043-1050
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078532835
Cited by
22
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Film in Education and Therapy
Keywords
mental health stigma, help-seeking attitudes, social distance, film festivals, feature films, documentary film, adolescents, mental illness, media influence, film content, age and gender differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Motion Pictures, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Psychological Distance, Young Adult, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review