Cited by 45Eating Disorders and BehaviorsPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsSuicide and Self-Harm Studies

Disordered eating attitudes, alexithymia and suicide probability among Turkish high school girls

Alpaslan, Ahmet Hamdi, Soylu, Nusret, AVCI, Kadriye, Coşkun, Kerem Şenol, Kocak, Uğur, Taş, Hanife Uzel·2015·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

We aimed to examine association between disordered eating attitudes (DEAs), alexithymia and suicide probability among adolescent females and to explore potential link between alexithymia and suicide probability in subjects with DEAs. 381 female students completed Eating Attitude Test (EAT-26), Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) and Suicide Probability Scale (SPS). It was found that 13.2% (n=52) of the subjects have DEAs. Results indicated that total TAS-20 score and scores of Difficulty in Identifying Feelings (DIF) and Difficulty in Describing Feelings (DDF) subscales were significantly higher in DEAs group than in those non DEAs group (p<0.05). Additionally, total SPS score (p<0.001), Hopelessness (p=0.001), Suicide Ideation (p<0.001) and Hostility (p=0.003) subscales scores of SPS were significantly higher in the alexithymic DEAs than the non-alexithymic DEAs group. In order to control potential effect of depression, SPS subscales were used as covariate factors in ANCOVA. Negative Self-Evaluation subscale yielded a statistically significant difference between groups, other subscales did not. Results point out these; DEAs are relatively frequent phenomenon among female students in Turkey and presence of alexithymia was associated with an increased suicide probability in adolescents with DEAs. The results should be evaluated taking into account that depressive symptomatology was not assessed using a depression scale.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.12.052

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Alpaslan, A. H., Soylu, N., AVCI, K., Coşkun, K. Ş., Kocak, U., & Taş, H. U.
Affiliations
  • Afyon Kocatepe University (TR)
  • Inonu University (TR)
Corresponding author
Alpaslan, Ahmet Hamdi
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
226
Issue
1
Pages
224-229
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977249654
Cited by
45
References
54
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7
FWCI
6.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
disordered eating attitudes, alexithymia, suicide probability, adolescent girls, suicidal ideation, hopelessness, hostility, difficulty identifying feelings, difficulty describing feelings, eating disorders, Turkish adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affective Symptoms, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Attitude, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Personality Inventory, Probability, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schools, Students, Turkey, Suicidal Ideation, Diagnostic Self Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review