Cited by 164Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlEmotion and Mood RecognitionNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Is heart rate variability (HRV) an adequate tool for evaluating human emotions? – A focus on the use of the International Affective Picture System (IAPS)

Open access
Choi, Kwang-Ho, Kim, Junbeom, Kwon, O. Sang, Kim, Min Ji, Ryu, Yeon Hee, Park, Ji-Eun·2017·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Because human emotion varies greatly among individuals and is a qualitative factor, measuring it with any degree of accuracy is very difficult. Heart rate variability (HRV), which is used in evaluations of the autonomic nervous system (ANS), is used to evaluate human emotions. This study examines the validity of HRV as a tool to evaluate emotions using the International Affective Picture System (IAPS). For experimentation, five photos were selected for each of the categories of "happy," "unhappy", and "neutral" from among the images provided by the IAPS. The subjects were required to complete the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) after being shown each picture. We extracted the R-R interval (RRI) value of each photo from the PPG, as well as the valence, arousal, and dominance value of each photo from the SAM to analyze their correlation. As results, there was significant positive correlation with valence and significant negative correlation with dominance in the photo simulation associated with the "unhappy" emotion, only when the arousal value exceeded a critical value. Therefore, the findings of this study suggest that it is possible to use an HRV-based evaluation only when a high level of emotion is induced by visual stimulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.02.025

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Choi, K.-H., Kim, J., Kwon, O. S., Kim, M. J., Ryu, Y. H., & Park, J.-E.
Affiliations
Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine (KR)
Corresponding author
Park, Ji-Eun
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
251
Pages
192-196
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2587064974
Cited by
164
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
FWCI
13.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine (K16813, K17070)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
heart rate variability, emotion measurement, International Affective Picture System, autonomic nervous system, valence, arousal, dominance, Self-Rating Manikin, RR interval, photoplethysmography
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Emotions, Female, Happiness, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Self-Assessment, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review