A disconnection between nutritional status (in terms of body mass index and phase angle) and psychopathology in anorexia nervosa
Abstract
The aim of our study was to investigate the relationship between nutritional status (body mass index and phase angle) and psychological symptoms at admission and discharge in a residential population of anorexic patients. We also aimed to determine the evolution of the above psychological symptoms and nutrition rehabilitation from admission to discharge. Thirty-six consecutive patients were included. The evaluation was performed using the following measures at admission and discharge: body mass index, phase angle, Eating Disorders Inventory-3, Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 and Body Uneasiness. Admission and discharge nutritional status were not correlated with psychometric scores respectively at admission and at discharge. In addition, neither the improvement in the scores on the psychometric scales between admission and discharge was correlated to body mass index, phase angle improvement. For the group as a whole there were significant improvements from admission to discharge in nutritional status, Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Depression, Body Uneasiness-Global Score Index and in all the composites of Eating Disorders Inventory-3. Our data showed a disconnection between nutritional status and eating disorders psychopathology and/or psychiatric comorbidities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research suggests no relationship between nutritional status and ED psychopathology or psychiatric comorbidities.
“along with research suggesting no relationship between nutritional status and ED psychopathology or psychiatric comorbidities”
From Is there a basis for a weight cut‐off point? A large‐scale investigation of atypical anorexia and anorexia nervosa subtypes among patients at a residential treatment centre. (2024) · cites this paper as Fortunato et al., 2017
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 23 · Cited by 11
- Authors
- Fortunato, F., Demartini, B., Maffoni, C., Apicella, E., Leonardi, V., & Mendolicchio, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Milan (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Demartini, Benedetta
- Venue
- Psychiatry Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 252
- Pages
- 196-200
- ISSN
- 0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2590410046
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Keywords
- anorexia nervosa, nutritional status, body mass index, phase angle, body composition, psychiatric comorbidity, depression, body uneasiness, residential treatment, nutritional rehabilitation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Nutritional Status, Patient Admission, Patient Discharge, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Psychopathology, Body Mass Index
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review