Cited by 16Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Motivation deficits in individuals with social anhedonia

Wang, Jiao, Huang, Jia, Lui, Simon S.Y., Cheung, Eric F.C., Yue, Xiao-dong, Chan, Raymond C.K.·2018·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Patients with schizophrenia have been reported to exhibit anhedonia, a reduced hedonic capacity and deficits in motivation for reward pursuit. However, it is unclear whether these deficits also exist in at-risk individuals prone to psychosis or not. The present study compared 26 individuals with social anhedonia and 28 healthy controls using a grip Effort-based Pleasure Experience Task (E-PET). The findings showed that individuals with social anhedonia did not increase their hard task choices with the elevation of reward magnitude and probability while healthy controls did. Higher reward probability and magnitude did not lead to more anticipatory pleasure in individuals with social anhedonia. The mean anticipatory pleasure experience ratings in individuals with social anhedonia were significantly lower than controls. Our results suggest that individuals with social anhedonia already exhibit motivational deficits during reward pursuit.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.01.033

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Impaired learning makes it hard to recouple social approach behaviors and motivation with positive emotional experiences.

    “Impaired learning will then make it hard to recouple social approach behaviors and motivation with positive emotional experiences (67).”

    From A transdiagnostic perspective on social anhedonia (2019) · cites this paper as [67]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, J., Huang, J., Lui, S. S. Y., Cheung, E. F. C., Yue, X.-D., & Chan, R. C. K.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Castle Peak Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Huang, Jia
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
261
Pages
527-534
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2792928076
Cited by
16
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Basic Research Program of China (2016YFC0906402)
  • Beijing Training Project for Leading Talents in S&T (Z151100000315020)
  • Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (Z161100000216138)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81571317, 31100747)
  • CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health of the Institute of Psychology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
social anhedonia, motivational deficits, anhedonia, effort-based decision making, anticipatory pleasure, psychosis risk, schizophrenia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Choice Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Reward, Young Adult, Pleasure, Anhedonia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review