Cited by 58Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareCultural Competency in Health Care

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Health literacy in people living with mental illness: A latent profile analysis

Abstract

Health literacy comprises cognitive and social skills that enable people to understand health information and maintain good health. Research examining the health literacy of people living with mental illness is scarce. The aim of the present study was to identify distinct subgroups of health literacy in individuals attending mental health treatment and determine if profiles and health literacy levels differ from other populations accessing healthcare services and on health characteristics. Participants (N = 325) were attending Neami National Australia services. Participants completed the multidimensional Health Literacy Questionnaire. Latent profile analysis was conducted to identify health literacy profiles. Participants reported lowest health literacy scores in appraising health information, navigating the healthcare system, and finding good health information. Three health literacy profiles were identified; low (20.4%), moderate (61.3%), and high (18.3%). Compared to the other populations (i.e. private hospital patients, men with prostate cancer, older individuals with diabetes, general population, people attending substance dependence treatment), the current sample tended to have lower health literacy scores. The findings highlight the need to increase overall health literacy and consider an individualised approach to enhance specific health literacy domains.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112499

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Degan, T. J., Kelly, P. J., Robinson, L. D., Deane, F. P., Wolstencroft, K., Turut, S., & Meldrum, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Wollongong (AU)
  • Neami National (AU)
Corresponding author
Degan, Tayla J.
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
280
Pages
112499
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2966371103
Cited by
58
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Neami National
  • Australia and an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
health literacy, mental illness, latent profile analysis, psychotherapy
MeSH terms
Latent Class Analysis, Adult, Australia, Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Health Literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review