Cited by 36Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

The interaction of dissociation, pain tolerance, and suicidal ideation in predicting suicide attempts

Rabasco, Ana, Andover, Margaret S.·2020·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Pain tolerance and dissociation have individually been shown to be risk factors for suicidal behaviors. The aim of the current study was to investigate how dissociation and physiological pain tolerance influence the relation between suicidal thoughts and behaviors. The sample consisted of 70 undergraduate college students who completed self-report measures of suicidality and dissociation and an electrical stimulation task to measure physiological pain tolerance. Results showed that dissociation and suicidal ideation, but not pain tolerance, were independently associated with increased suicide attempts. A three-way interaction of suicidal ideation, physiological pain tolerance, and dissociation statistically predicted number of suicide attempts, with an increased number of suicide attempts associated with high suicidal ideation and dissociation, regardless of pain tolerance. These results suggest that dissociation plays a significant role in predicting suicide attempts, perhaps by engendering a state of disconnect from one's body.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112661

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relative to psychiatric controls and healthy volunteers, individuals with prior suicide attempts showed elevated pain tolerance.

    “Relative to psychiatric controls and healthy volunteers, individuals with prior suicide attempts showed elevated pain tolerance (Orbach et al., 1996a,b, 1997) (for an exception, see Rabasco & Andover, 2020).”
  • High levels of dissociation are associated with an increased number of suicide attempts, regardless of an individual's ability to tolerate pain.

    “These theoretical ideas are consistent with evidence from existing literature that high levels of dissociation are associated with an increased number of suicide attempts, regardless of an individual’s ability to tolerate pain (Rabasco and Andover, 2020).”

    From The Psychological Pathway to Suicide Attempts: A Strategy of Control Without Awareness (2021) · cites this paper as Rabasco and Andover, 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rabasco, A., & Andover, M. S.
Affiliations
Fordham University (US)
Corresponding author
Andover, Margaret S.
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
284
Pages
112661
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2983070957
Cited by
35
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
dissociation, pain tolerance, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, university students, suicide risk prediction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Pain Measurement, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Students, Suicide, Attempted, Universities, Pain Threshold, Young Adult, Self Report, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review