Cited by 132COVID-19 and Mental HealthCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsPsychiatric care and mental health services

Psychiatric emergency care during Coronavirus 2019 (COVID 19) pandemic lockdown: results from a Department of Mental Health and Addiction of northern Italy.

Open access
Capuzzi, Enrico, Di Brita, Carmen, Caldiroli, Alice, Colmegna, Fabrizia, Nava, Roberto, Buoli, Massimiliano, Clerici, Massimo·2020·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Background The current COVID-19 pandemic and the consequent containment measures are leading to increasing mental health issues both in psychiatric patients and general population.Objective We aimed to compare the number and characteristics of emergency psychiatric consultations during the phase 1 of lockdown with respect to the same period in 2019 in a Department of Mental Health and Addiction (DMHA) located in Lombardy region.Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study including subjects consecutively admitted to two psychiatric emergency rooms of DMHA in Monza, Lombardy, Italy. Sociodemographic data, clinical characteristics, referred symptoms, diagnosis and information on patients' illness course following the emergency consultations were collected. No subjects were excluded for the purposes of the study.Results Between February 21st and May 3rd 2020, there was a marked reduction in the number of psychiatric emergency consultations, if compared to the same period of 2019. Subjects who were living in psychiatric residential treatment facilities, had cannabis addiction and a diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder were significantly more likely to present to emergency psychiatric consultations during lockdown.Conclusions COVID-19 epidemic may have a negative impact on more vulnerable individuals. Strategies to enhance relapse prevention and the use of alternative approaches as e-health technologies should be promoted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113463

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Capuzzi et al. (2020) reported a rise in self-harm / suicide attempts as a proportion of total emergency department presentations in Italy, but this rise in proportion was in the context of falls in absolute numbers of cases, set against reductions in total emergency department attendances.

    “Capuzzi et al. (2020) reported a rise in self-harm / suicide attempts as a proportion of total emergency department presentations in Italy, but this rise in the proportion of cases was in the context of falls in the absolute numbers of cases, set against reductions in total emergency department attendances.”
  • Eight studies reported a decrease in self-harm/suicide attempts during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    “Eight studies reported a decrease in self-harm/suicide attempts during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic ( Capuzzi et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2020; Goncalves-Pinho et al., 2021; Hewson et al., 2020; McIntyre et al., 2020; Pignon et al., 2020; Rajput et al., 2020; Walker et al., 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Prestia D. Andrea P. Martina O. Escelsior A. Dèttore D. Maria A. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with OCD: Effects of contamination symptoms and remission state before the quarantine in a preliminary naturalistic study Psychiatry Research 291 2020 113 213 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113213 PMC7280119 32535508 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Capuzzi, E., Di Brita, C., Caldiroli, A., Colmegna, F., Nava, R., Buoli, M., & Clerici, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
Corresponding author
Capuzzi, Enrico
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
293
Pages
113463
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3087737236
Cited by
132
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 1
FWCI
10.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown, psychiatric emergency care, mental health service utilization, psychiatric residential treatment, cannabis use disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, relapse prevention, eHealth technologies, Lombardy
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Emergency Service, Hospital, Emergency Services, Psychiatric, Female, Humans, Italy, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Pneumonia, Viral, Behavior, Addictive, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review