Do athletes’ responses to coach autonomy support and control depend on the situation and athletes’ personal motivation?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a study among judo athletes, a controlling intervention by a judo coach was perceived as more controlling and harmful when athletes, despite clear efforts, struggled to master a new technique compared to when the athletes were depicted as disturbing the training of their peers.
“For instance, in a study among judo athletes, a controlling intervention by a judo coach was perceived as more controlling and harmful when athletes, despite clear efforts, struggled to master a new technique compared to when the athletes were depicted as disturbing the training of their peers (Delrue et al. 2019b).”
From Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions (2020) · cites this paper as Delrue et al. 2019b
Experimental studies indicate that learners benefit from an autonomy-supportive teaching style, with participants' motivational differences affecting these effects only to a limited extent.
“Similarly, experimental studies indicate that learners benefit from an autonomy-supportive teaching style, with participants' motivational differences affecting these effects only to a limited extent (e.g., Delrue et al. 2019b;De Meyer et al. 2016;Flünger et al. 2019).”
From Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions (2020) · cites this paper as Delrue et al. 2019b
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 84 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- Delrue, J., Soenens, B., Morbée, S., Vansteenkiste, M., & Haerens, L.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Delrue, Jochen
- Haerens, Leen
- Venue
- Psychology of Sport and Exercise
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 43
- Pages
- 321-332
- ISSN
- 1469-0292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2936541370
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 5.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology of sport and exercise (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Government of Flanders, Department of Sport (B/14197/02-IV2, gs1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Martial Arts: Techniques, Psychology, and Education
- Keywords
- coach autonomy support, self-determination theory, athlete motivation, amotivation, situational context, need satisfaction, need frustration, anger, judo athletes, sports coaching
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
