Cited by 230Diabetes Management and EducationAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Review of Treating Depression in Diabetes: Emerging Findings

Open access

Abstract

Background Depression in patients with diabetes is associated with poorer adherence and worse health outcomes, however treating depression may help improve these outcomes.Objective The present systematic review identified published papers to evaluate treatments for depression in patients with diabetes.Results Seventeen studies that met criteria were identified, indicating that psychosocial interventions, particularly cognitive-behavior therapy, anti-depressant medications, and collaborative care are effective in the treatment of depression in patients with diabetes.Conclusion Evidence for the efficacy of these interventions in improving glycemic control was mixed. No study targeted adherence to treatment or health behaviors in addition to depression, which may be necessary to maximize improvement in diabetes outcomes such as glycemic control.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psym.2010.11.007

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 108 references

1 of the 108 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 229

Metadata

Authors
Markowitz, S. M., Gonzalez, J. S., Wilkinson, J. L., & Safren, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Markowitz, Sarah M.
Venue
Psychosomatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
1-18
ISSN
0033-3182 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992579306
Cited by
230
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r01mh078571-01)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (1R01MH078571-01, R01 MH-078571)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
depression, diabetes mellitus, depression treatment, psychosocial interventions, cognitive behavioral therapy, antidepressants, collaborative care, glycemic control, medication adherence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Child, Cooperative Behavior, Depressive Disorder, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Health Education, Humans, Mental Health Services, Patient Education as Topic, Psychotherapy, Self Care, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review