Cited by 31Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsChronic Disease Management StrategiesMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Complexity assessed by the INTERMED in patients with somatic symptom disorder visiting a specialized outpatient mental health care setting: a cross-sectional study

van Eck van der Sluijs, Jonna F., de Vroege, Lars, van Manen, Annick S., Rijnders, Cees A.Th, van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina M.·2017·Psychosomatics

Abstract

Background Somatic symptom disorders (SSD), a new classification in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition is associated with problematic diagnostic procedures and treatment that lead to complex care. In somatic health care, the INTERMED has been used to assess levels of complexity; however, in SSD this instrument has not yet been applied.Objective This study aims to explore complexity in patients with SSD using the INTERMED, hereby contributing to an increased comprehension of this new patient group.Method In this cross-sectional study, the INTERMED was used to assess complexity in outpatients with SSD at the Clinical Centre of Excellence for Body, Mind, and Health (The Netherlands), along biologic, psychologic, social, and health care domains. This was done retrospectively with patient files from consecutive patients from 2011 until 2015.Results In the total SSD sample (N = 187), 63% was female, the mean age (standard deviation) was 42 (±12.4) years, with an average educational level. The mean INTERMED score was 23.5 indicating high overall complexity in this population. A high proportion of our sample (69%) scored as highly complex (>20). High complexity was associated with higher depression and anxiety scores, but not with a higher number of physical symptoms.Conclusions This study demonstrates that patients with SSD form a high-complex group, with higher scores compared with literature about multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, or patient waiting for a liver transplant. INTERMED outcomes indicate a need for extensive diagnostic procedures and integrated multidisciplinary care for patients with SSD. Attention should especially be paid to mental disorders (depression and anxiety), given their association with high complexity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psym.2017.02.008

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Eck van der Sluijs, J. F., de Vroege, L., van Manen, A. S., Rijnders, C. A. T., & van der Feltz-Cornelis, C. M.
Affiliations
GGz Breburg (NL)
Venue
Psychosomatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
427-436
ISSN
0033-3182 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2590518489
Cited by
31
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
somatic symptom disorder, INTERMED, care complexity, psychiatric outpatients, depression, anxiety, somatic symptoms, multidisciplinary care, diagnostic procedures
MeSH terms
Medically Unexplained Symptoms, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Male, Netherlands, Outpatients, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Somatoform Disorders, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review