Neural correlates of the individual emotional Stroop in borderline personality disorder
Abstract
Objective Emotional dysregulation is a key feature of borderline personality disorder (BPD) with altered inhibitory functions having suggested as being crucial. The anterior cingulate cortex and further prefrontal brain regions are crucial for response inhibition. The regulation of emotions is ensured via inhibitory control over the amygdala. The present study aimed to investigate neural correlates of response inhibition in BPD by using an emotional Stroop paradigm extending the task to word stimuli which were related to stressful life events.Methods Twenty BPD patients and 20 healthy controls underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while performing the individual emotional Stroop task. A block design was used with the following word type conditions: neutral words, general negative words, and individual negative words. The individual negative words were recruited from a prior interview conducted with each participant.Results While BPD patients had overall slower reaction times in the Stroop task compared to healthy controls, there was no increased slowing with emotional interference. Controls exhibited significant fMRI blood oxygenation level-dependent signal increases in the anterior cingulate cortex as well as in frontal cortex contrasting generally negative vs. neutral and individual negative vs. neutral conditions, respectively. BPD patients did not show equivalent signal changes.Conclusions These results provide further evidence for a dysfunctional network of brain areas in BPD, including the ACC and frontal brain regions. These areas are crucial for the regulation of stress and emotions, the core problems of BPD patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Wingenfeld et al. (2009) found that BPD patients displayed overall slower reaction times than HCs, with no increase of reaction times after emotional interference, and controls but not BPD patients showed significant recruitment of the ACC and frontal areas for negative versus neutral words; no significant correlations between DSS and behavioral measures or neural activity were reported.
“Patients displayed overall slower reaction times than HCs, while no increase of reaction times after emotional interference was observed. Controls, but not BPD patients, showed a significant recruitment of the ACC and frontal areas for generally negative versus neutral and for individual negative versus neutral words, respectively. No significant correlations between DSS and behavioral measures or”
From Dissociation and Alterations in Brain Function and Structure: Implications for Borderline Personality Disorder (2017) · cites this paper as [140]
BPD patients were not able to recruit rACC when they needed to control for negative words.
“However, the BPD patients were not able to recruit rACC when they needed to control for negative words (see Figure 8C).”
From Top-Down Dysregulation—From ADHD to Emotional Instability (2016) · cites this paper as Wingenfeld et al., 2009
BPD patients had overall slower reaction times compared to healthy controls but no increased slowing with emotional interference in a verbal emotional Stroop task.
“Using a verbal emotional Stroop task, Wingenfeld et al. (2009) observed that BPD patients had overall slower reaction times compared to healthy controls but no increased slowing with emotional interference.”
From Top-Down Dysregulation—From ADHD to Emotional Instability (2016) · cites this paper as Wingenfeld et al., 2009
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 102 · Cited by 124
- Authors
- Wingenfeld, K., Rullkoetter, N., Mensebach, C., Beblo, T., Mertens, M., Kreisel, S., Toepper, M., Driessen, M., & Woermann, F. G.
- Affiliations
- Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bielefeld (DE)
- Bielefeld University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Wingenfeld, Katja
- ORCID
- Venue
- Psychoneuroendocrinology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 571-586
- ISSN
- 0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1971119192
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 102
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 8.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
- Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Keywords
- borderline personality disorder, emotional Stroop task, response inhibition, emotional dysregulation, anterior cingulate cortex, prefrontal cortex, amygdala, life events, neural correlates, emotional interference
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Borderline Personality Disorder, Brain Mapping, Conflict, Psychological, Emotions, Female, Frontal Lobe, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reaction Time, Reference Values, Case-Control Studies, Matched-Pair Analysis, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review