The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impacted publics’ perceptions of crisis communication decision making
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1007/bf00988593 · Cited by 11,133
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Claeys, 2016, Why practitioners do (Not) apply crisis communication theory in practice, Journal of Public Relations Research, 28, 232, 10.1080/1062726X.2016.1261703 · DOI
- Claeys, 2010, Restoring reputations in times of crisis: An experimental study of the Situational Crisis Communication Theory and the moderating effects of locus of control, Public Relations Review, 36, 256, 10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.05.004 · DOI
- Coombs, 2004, Impact of past crises on current crisis communication: Insights from situational crisis communication theory, Journal of Business Communication, 41, 265, 10.1177/0021943604265607 · DOI
- Coombs, 2007, Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory, Corporate Reputation Review, 10, 163, 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049 · DOI
- Fortunato, 2008, Restoring a reputation: The Duke University lacrosse scandal, Public Relations Review, 34, 116, 10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.03.006 · DOI
- Freeman, 2006, Substance sells: Aligning corporate reputation and corporate responsibility, Public Relations Quarterly, 51, 12
- Gibson, 2006, The importance of reputation and the role of public relations, Public Relations Quarterly, 51, 15
- Jin, 2018, Crisis communication and ethics: The role of public relations, Journal of Business Strategy, 39, 43, 10.1108/JBS-09-2016-0095 · DOI
- Lange, 2011, Organizational reputation: A review, Journal of Management, 37, 153, 10.1177/0149206310390963 · DOI · Paper page
- Men, 2012, CEO credibility, perceived organizational reputation, and employee engagement, Public Relations Review, 38, 171, 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.12.011 · DOI
- Patterson, 1993, Crises impact on reputation management, The Public Relations Journal, 49, 48
- Richards, 2017, A knockout to the NFL’s reputation?: A case study of the NFL’s crisis communications strategies in response to the Ray Rice scandal, Public Relations Review, 43, 615, 10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.015 · DOI
- Sisco, 2012, Nonprofit in crisis: An examination of the applicability of situational crisis communication theory, Journal of Public Relations Research, 24, 1, 10.1080/1062726X.2011.582207 · DOI
- Steinhauser, 2019, Ethiopian airlines black boxes showed “clear similarities” with lion air crash, The Wall Street Journal
- Woods, 2016, Advancing qualitative research using qualitative data analysis software (QDAS)? Reviewing potential versus practice in published studies using ATLAS.tI and NVivo, 1994–2013, Social Science Computer Review, 34, 597, 10.1177/0894439315596311 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Butler, S. D.
- Venue
- Public Relations Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-12
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 102120
- ISSN
- 0363-8111
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impacted publics’ perceptions of crisis communication decision making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102120
- The paper
- Butler, S. D. (2021). Impacted publics’ perceptions of crisis communication decision making. Public Relations Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
