Cited by 960Corporate Identity and ReputationManagement and Organizational StudiesOrganizational Strategy and Culture

Organizational Reputation: A Review

Lange, Donald, Lee, Peggy M., Dai, Ye·2011·Journal of Management

Abstract

The idea of organizational reputation is intuitive and simple in its common usage. However, it is surprisingly complex when employed and investigated in management research, as evidenced by the multiple definitions, conceptualizations, and operationalizations that have emerged across studies. The authors see the past decade as a formative phase of the research, characterized by attempts to bring theoretical coherence and rigor to the subject area. In their review of the management literature, the authors focus on this formative period in particular. They attempt to inspire and guide management researchers by clarifying what organizational reputation is. In particular, they identify three dominant conceptualizations, namely, that reputation consists of familiarity with the organization, beliefs about what to expect from the organization in the future, and impressions about the organization’s favorability. The final part of the review is an overview of recent empirical findings in the management literature pertaining to the effects or causes of organizational reputation. The authors conclude by drawing attention to some important directions for future research, including the needs to investigate organizational reputation as multidimensional and dynamic and to model its antecedents and effects as more complex than the unidirectional models typically proposed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0149206310390963

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A firm's environmental reputation is positively associated with its environmental performance ratings.

    “Implicit in this operationalization is the notion that these environmental performance ratings are positively correlated with a firm's environmental reputation, or the degree to which a firm is known for strong environmental performance and practices(Lange, Lee, and Dai, 2011;Jensen, Kim, and Kim, 2012).”

    From Strategic Silence: Withholding Certification Status as a Hypocrisy Avoidance Tactic (2018) · cites this paper as Lange, Lee, and Dai, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lange, D., Lee, P. M., & Dai, Y.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Lange, Donald
Venue
Journal of Management
Published
2010-12-20
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
153-184
ISSN
  • 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1211
OpenAlex
W1979032294
Cited by
960
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 67 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 19
FWCI
57.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Identity and Reputation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Strategy and Culture
Keywords
organizational reputation, reputation model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review