Cited by 167Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMigration, Health and TraumaMental Health Treatment and Access

One year later: Mental health problems among survivors in hard-hit areas of the Wenchuan earthquake.

Zhang, Z., Shi, Z., Wang, L., Liu, M.·2011·Public Health

Abstract

Objectives To investigate the prevalence of probable post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety and depression, and to identify risk factors related to these mental disorders among hard-hit survivors 1 year after the earthquake in Wenchuan, China. Study design : Cross-sectional survey. Methods A door-to-door survey covering the entire temporary community was undertaken to investigate 1195 adult earthquake survivors. The survey instruments included a questionnaire determining exposure to the earthquake, the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C), the Hopkins Symptoms Checklist-25 (HSCL-25), and the Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were undertaken to examine potential risk factors. Results The prevalence rates of probable PTSD, anxiety and depression were 26.3%, 49.8% and 49.6%, respectively. Risk factors varied between the disorders. Among middle-aged and elderly people, bodily injury, loss of livelihood and initial fear during the earthquake were independently and significantly associated with all three mental disorders, while female gender was independently and significantly associated with PTSD and depression. Conclusions PTSD, anxiety and depression remained at an elevated level among survivors in hard-hit regions 1 year after the earthquake in Wenchuan. The groups at high risk of mental problems should be specifically attended.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.puhe.2010.12.008

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Z., Shi, Z., Wang, L., & Liu, M.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, L.
Venue
Public Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
125
Issue
5
Pages
293-300
ISSN
0033-3506 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093942767
Cited by
167
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
FWCI
17.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
Wenchuan earthquake, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, depression, earthquake survivors, mental health, risk factors, personal injury, livelihood loss, perceived social support, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, China, Cross-Sectional Studies, Data Collection, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Social Support, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Prevalence, Young Adult, Earthquakes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review