Cited by 26Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Ethnic and sex differences in E-cigarette use and relation to alcohol use in California adolescents: the California Health Interview Survey

Wong, D.N., Fan, W.·2018·Public Health

Abstract

Objectives E-cigarette use is not only prevalent among adolescents but is growing at an alarming rate. This study sought to determine e-cigarette use prevalence and its relation to alcohol use as a potential gateway drug, and how this may differ by sex and ethnicity in a multi-ethnic sample of California adolescents.Study design Cross-sectional survey.Methods We included data from 1806 adolescents (weighted to 3.0 million) aged 12-17 in the 2014 and 2015 California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) cycles. The prevalence of e-cigarette use was calculated within sex and ethnic groups and the prevalence of alcohol use according to e-cigarette use was also examined with sample weighting providing population estimates. Multiple logistic regression models were built to predict the odds of using alcohol from e-cigarette use status adjusted for sociodemographic and other characteristics.Results The prevalence of e-cigarette use was 9.1% (projected to 0.3 million) overall in California adolescents but highest in boys among non-Hispanic Whites (15.1%) and in Asian girls (13.3%). Among e-cigarette users, 61.3% of boys and 71.0% of girls reported using alcohol as well. The logistic regression odds of alcohol use, adjusted for age, ethnicity, body mass index, cigarette smoking status, socioeconomic status, parents' education level, and insurance status among e-cigarettes users (compared with non-users) was 9.2 in girls and 3.1 in boys (both P < 0.01). Asians/others, non-Hispanic whites and Hispanics were similarly at increased odds: 17.8, 5.4, and 3.0, respectively (P < 0.01 for Asians/others and for whites) of using alcohol compared with their non-e-cigarette using counterparts, respectively.Conclusion Attention needs to be paid to the high prevalence of e-cigarette smoking as well as its potential as a gateway drug for alcohol drinking in adolescents, especially among girls and Asians.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.01.019

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wong, D. N., & Fan, W.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Fan, W.
ORCID
Fan, W.
Venue
Public Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
157
Pages
147-152
ISSN
0033-3506 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791289574
Cited by
26
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
vaping, adolescent alcohol use, gateway effect, sex differences, ethnic differences, Asian adolescents, adolescent smoking, California Health Interview Survey
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Alcohol Drinking, Asian, California, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Ethnicity, Female, Health Surveys, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Smoking, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Sex Distribution, White People, Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review