Cited by 36Art Therapy and Mental HealthHealth disparities and outcomesCultural Industries and Urban Development

Does arts and cultural engagement vary geographically? Evidence from the UK household longitudinal study

Open access
Mak, H.W., Coulter, R., Fancourt, D.·2020·Public Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have shown the beneficial impacts of arts participation and cultural engagement on health outcomes. However, this engagement is socially patterned and is also possibly influenced by geographical factors. STUDY DESIGN: The aim of this study was to examine the association between geographical factors (spatial setting and neighbourhood characteristics) and arts and cultural engagement amongst adults in the UK. METHODS: Data analysed were from Understanding Society Wave 2 (2010/12) with a total sample size of 26,215. Logistic and ordinal regression was used to identify geographical predictors for the patterns of the engagement. RESULTS: Our results show that there are geographical differences in participation independent of individual demographic and socio-economic backgrounds. In particular, there was more evidence for differences in the participation based on neighbourhood characteristics (e.g. level of area deprivation). We also found some interactions between individual and geographical factors for cultural engagement but not for arts participation. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals a geographical and individual socio-economic gradient in arts and cultural engagement. Given the health benefits of arts engagement, improving access to arts and cultural programmes geographically may potentially help to reduce health inequalities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.04.029

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gender differences in engagement have been observed, which may increase with age, with women in older age groups more likely to attend arts events than men.

    “Gender differences in engagement have also been observed, which may increase with age, with women in older age groups more likely to attend arts events than men [16].”

    From Difference in predictors and barriers to arts and cultural engagement with age in the United States: A cross-sectional analysis using the Health and Retirement Study (2021) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) reports previous research suggesting gender differences in arts engagement, with women more likely to engage. It does not say that the difference increases with age or that older women are more likely than older men to attend arts events; the Results > Demographics section reports age and gender separately without that comparison. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Similar trends are seen with cultural attendance alongside declines in physical activity.

    “Similar trends are seen with cultural attendance (such as visiting museums, historic parks and gardens) alongside declines in physical activity [16].”

    From Difference in predictors and barriers to arts and cultural engagement with age in the United States: A cross-sectional analysis using the Health and Retirement Study (2021) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Methods (Measures; page unavailable) identify museum and heritage-site visits as forms of cultural engagement, and the Discussion reports geographic differences in that engagement. The paper does not report a decline in cultural attendance alongside declining physical activity; its Introduction mentions physical activity only as another behaviour that may be influenced by population composition. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. [1]Fancourt D. Finn S. WHO health evidence synthesis report- cultural contexts of health: the role of the arts in improving health and well-being in the WHO European region 2019 32091683
  2. [2]Mak H.W. Coulter R. Fancourt D. Patterns of social inequality in arts and cultural participation: findings from a nationally-representative sample of adults living in the UK WHO Public Health Pap 6 1 2020 55 68 PMC7613128 35874800
  3. [5]Parkinson A. Buttrick J. Wallis A. Equality and diversity within the arts and cultural sector in England: evidence and literature review final report 2014
  4. [8]Lehman B. Dumais S.A. Poetics [Internet] Feminization of arts participation and extracurricular activities ? Gender differences in cultural capital and bullying victimization vol. 61 2017 26 38 10.1016/j.poetic.2016.12.003 Available from: · DOI
  5. [10]Galster G.C. The mechanism(s) of neighbourhood effects: theory, evidence, and policy implications van Ham M. Manley D. Bailey N. Simpson L. Maclennan D. Neighbourhood effects research: new perspectives [internet] 2012 Springer Netherlands Dordrecht 23 56 10.1007/978-94-007-2309-2_2 Available from: · DOI
  6. [12]Faber J.W. Sharkey P. Neighborhood effects International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences 2nd ed. 2015 Elsevier Inc. 443 449
  7. [15]Parkinson C. White M. Inequalities, the arts and public health: towards an international conversation Arts Health 5 3 2013 177 189 25729409 PMC4340529
  8. [16]Duncan D.T. Kawachi I. Neighborhoods and health 2nd ed. 2018 Oxford University Press New York 372
  9. [17]Duncan C. Jones K. Moon G. Smoking and deprivation: are there neighbourhood effects? Soc Sci Med 48 4 1999 497 505 10075175
  10. [18]Pollack C.E. Cubbin C. Ahn D. Winkleby M. Neighbourhood deprivation and alcohol consumption: does the availability of alcohol play a role? Int J Epidemiol 34 4 2005 772 780 15737966
  11. [19]Li F. Fisher K.J. Brownson R.C. Bosworth M. Multilevel modelling of built environment characteristics related to neighbourhood walking activity in older adults J Epidemiol Community Health 59 7 2005 558 564 15965138 PMC1757084
  12. [21]Bickerdike L. Booth A. Wilson P.M. Farley K. Wright K. Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence BMJ Open 7 e013384 2017 1 17 PMC5558801 28389486
  13. [22]Drinkwater C. Wildman J. Moffatt S. Social prescribing [Internet] Perfusion 364 l1285 2018 1 5 10.1136/bmj.l1285 Available from: 30923039 · DOI
  14. [24]Alderwick H.A.J. Gottlieb L.M. Fichtenberg C.M. Adler N.E. Social prescribing in the U.S. And England: emerging interventions to address patients' social needs Am J Prev Med [Internet] 54 5 2018 715 718 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.01.039 Available from: 29551326 · DOI
  15. [25]Jensen A. Stickley T. Torrissen W. Stigmar K. Arts on prescription in Scandinavia: a review of current practice and future possibilities Perspect Public Health 137 5 2017 268 274 27852837
  16. [32]Bourdieu P. Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste vol. 112 1984 Harvard University Press USA: Cambridge, Massachusetts 211 212

Cited by

Authors
Mak, H. W., Coulter, R., & Fancourt, D.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Fancourt, D.
Venue
Public Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
185
Pages
119-126
ISSN
0033-3506 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3039761341
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 1
FWCI
44.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Cultural Industries and Urban Development
Keywords
arts participation, cultural participation, regional variation, neighborhood characteristics, area deprivation, social gradient, health disparities, access to art, Understanding Society
MeSH terms
Adult, Art, Community Participation, Culture, Family Characteristics, Female, Geography, United Kingdom, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Residence Characteristics, Socioeconomic Factors, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review