Cited by 163Hydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesCoastal and Marine DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transport

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Riverbank changes along the Mekong River: Remote sensing detection in the Vientiane–Nong Khai area

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.quaint.2007.10.015

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The results could be directly relevant for other riverine populations affected by riverbank erosion and flooding.

    “The results could be directly relevant for other riverine populations which are affected by riverbank erosion and flooding—two phenomena that occur not only in Bangladesh, but likewise along other major rivers worldwide such as the Nile, the Yellow River, or the Mekong (Kummu et al., 2008; Yao et al., 2011).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Le, M.H., Tanaka, H., Tu, N.T., Viet, N.T., 2006. Prediction of river bank erosion in the lower Mekong river delta. Vietnam-Japan Estuary Workshop, 22–24 August, Hanoi, Vietnam.
  2. Lu, XX. Wang, J.J., Grundy-Warr, C., Poulsen, U. (in press). Are the Chinese dams blamed for the lower water levels in the Lower Mekong? In: Varis, O., Kummu, M., Keskinen, M. (Eds.), Modern Myths of the Mekong.
  3. Neave, 2002, Responses to feature on “potential physical and environmental impacts of dam building in the Lancang-Mekong Basin, Yunnan”, Mekong Update and Dialogue, 5, 4
  4. Rutherfurd, I., Bishop, P., Walker, M., Stensholt, B., 1996. Recent channel change in the Mekong River near Vientiane: implications for the border between Thailand and Lao PDR. In: Stensholt, B. (Ed.), Development Dilemmas in the Mekong Subregion: Workshop Proceedings, Melbourne, Australia.
  5. World Rivers Review, 2001. Proposed Mekong Dam Scheme in China Threatens Millions in Downstream Countries, p. 5.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kummu, M., Lu, X. X., Rasphone, A., Sarkkula, J., & Koponen, J.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • National University of Laos (LA)
  • Finnish Environment Institute (FI)
Corresponding author
Kummu, Matti
Venue
Quaternary International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
186
Issue
1
Pages
100-112
ISSN
1040-6182 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094150284
Cited by
163
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Quaternary International (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Coastal and Marine Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
bank erosion, Mekong River, river islands, aerial photograph interpretation, river morphological change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review