CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 46

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Obsidian in the south-central Andes: Geological, geochemical, and archaeological assessment of north Patagonian sources (Argentina)

Barberena, Ramiro, Hajduk, Adán, Gil, Adolfo F., Neme, Gustavo A., Durán, Víctor, Glascock, Michael D., Giesso, Martín, Borrazzo, Karen, de la Paz Pompei, M., Laura Salgán, M., Cortegoso, Valeria, Villarosa, Gustavo, Rughini, Agustina A.·2011·Quaternary International
DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2010.09.013
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.quaint.2010.09.013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Laguna del Diamante and Cerro Huenul show less intensive human use, being underrepresented even in close areas compared to Laguna del Maule and/or Las Cargas sources.

    “The two sources selected for comparison in this paper e Laguna del Diamante and Cerro Huenul e show less intensive human use, being underrepresented even in close areas in comparison to Laguna del Maule and/or Las Cargas sources (Barberena et al., 2011;Dur an et al., 2012).”

    From Geographic vectors of human mobility in the andes (34–36° S): comparative analysis of ‘minor’ obsidian sources (2016) · cites this paper as Barberena et al., 2011

  • Cerro Huenul constitutes only 14% of the obsidian characterized in La Payunia volcanic field, despite being the closest source and accessible year round, and is outnumbered by Laguna del Maule source.

    “Despite being the closest source and accessible year round, it constitutes only 14% of the obsidian characterized in La Payunia volcanic field, being outnumbered by Laguna del Maule source (Barberena et al., 2011;Salg an et al., 2012;Cortegoso et al., 2012b).”

    From Geographic vectors of human mobility in the andes (34–36° S): comparative analysis of ‘minor’ obsidian sources (2016) · cites this paper as Barberena et al., 2011

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Belardi, J.B., Goñi, R., 2006. Representaciones rupestres y convergencia poblacional durante momentos tardíos en Santa Cruz (Patagonia argentina). El caso de la meseta del Strobel. In: Fiore, D., Podestá, M.M. (Eds.), Tramas en la Piedra. Producción y usos del arte rupestre. Buenos Aires, WAC, SAA, AAINA, pp. 85–94.
  2. Borrazzo, K., D’Orazio, M, Etchichury, M.C. Distribución espacial y uso prehistórico de las materias primas líticas “Miraflores” en el Norte de la Isla Grande de Tierra del Fuego (Argentina). In: Revista Chilena de Antropología , in press.
  3. Borrero, 1994, Arqueología de la Patagonia, Palimpsesto, 4, 9
  4. Borrero, L.A., 2002. Arqueología y biogeografía humana en el sur de Mendoza (Comentario crítico). In: Gil, A.F., Neme, G.A. (Eds.), Entre Montañas y Desiertos: Arqueología del sur de Mendoza. Buenos Aires, Scoeidad Argentina de Antropología, pp. 195–202.
  5. Charlin, 2009, Aprovisionamiento, explotación y circulación de obsidianas durante el Holoceno tardío en Pali Aike (Provincia de Santa Cruz), Relaciones de la Sociedad Argentina de Antropología, XXXIV, 53
  6. Cortegoso, 2008, Disponibilidad de recursos líticos en el noroeste de Mendoza: cambios en la organización tecnológica en la Cuenca del Río Blanco, Cazadores Recolectores en el Cono Sur, 3, 95
  7. De Francesco, 2006, Caracterización y procedencia de obsidianas de sitios arqueológicos del área natural protegida Laguna del Diamante (Mendoza Argentina) con metodología no destructiva por fluorescencia de rayos (XRF), Anales de Arqueología y Etnología, 61, 53
  8. Durán, 2004, Estudio de fuentes de aprovisionamiento y redes de distribución de obsidiana durante el Holoceno Tardío en el sur de Mendoza (Argentina), Estudios Atacameños, 28, 25
  9. Eerkens, 2002, Artifact size and chemical sourcing: studying the potential biases of selecting large artifacts for analysis, Society for California Archaeology Newsletter, 36, 25
  10. Escola, 2004, Variabilidad en la explotación y distribución de obsidianas en la Puna Meridional argentina, Estudios Atacameños, 28, 9
  11. Folguera, 2008, Crustal collapse in the Andean backarc since 2 Ma: Tromen volcanic plateau, Southern Central Andes (36°40′–37°30′S), Tectonophysics, 459, 140, 10.1016/j.tecto.2007.12.013 · DOI
  12. Giesso, 2008, Obsidian in Western Pampas, Argentina: Source Characterization and Provisioning Strategies, International Association for Obsidian Studies Bulletin, 38, 15
  13. Giesso, M., Durán, V., Neme, G.A., Glascock, M.D., Cortegoso, V., Gil, A.F., Sanhueza, L. A Study of Obsidian Source Usage in the Central Andes of Argentina and Chile. In: Archaeometry, in press.
  14. Gil, 2006, Arqueología de La Payunia (Mendoza, Argentina): El poblamiento humano en los márgenes de la agricultura, 10.30861/9781841719122 · DOI
  15. Gil, 2006, Distribuciones arqueológicas superficiales en Payunia-Llancanelo, Anales de Arqueología y Etnología, 61, 163
  16. Glascock, 2002, Obsidian provenance research in the Americas, Accounts of Chemical Research, 35, 611, 10.1021/ar010041f · DOI
  17. Groeber, 1947, Observaciones geológicas a lo largo del meridiano 70. 3. Hojas Domuyo, Mari Mahuida, Huarhuar Co y parte de Epu Lauken, Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina, II, 347
  18. Jones, 2003, Lithic source use and Paleoarchaic Foraging territories in the great basin, American Antiquity, 68, 5, 10.2307/3557031 · DOI
  19. Laguens, 2007, Más allá del horizonte: cazadores-recolectores e intercambio a larga distancia en Intihuasi (provincia de San Luis, Argentina), Intersecciones en Antropología, 8, 7
  20. López, 2009, Fuentes de aprovisionamiento y distribución de obsidianas en la Provincia del Neuquén, noroeste de la Patagonia Argentina, Intersecciones en Antropología, 10, 75
  21. Martínez, 2008, ArqueologÌa del curso inferior del rÌo Colorado: Estado actual del conocimiento e implicaciones para la din·mica poblacional de cazadores-recolectores pampeano-patagónicos, Cazadores Recolectores del Cono Sur, 3, 71
  22. Méndez, 2008, Transporte de obsidianas a lo largo de los Andes de Patagonia Central (Aisén, Chile), Cazadores Recolectores del Cono Sur, 3, 51
  23. Muñoz, 1988, The Quaternary volcanic belt of the southern continental margin of South America: Transverse structural and petrochemical variations across the segment between 38° and 39°S, Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 1, 147, 10.1016/0895-9811(88)90032-6 · DOI
  24. Neme, 2008, Biogeografía humana en los Andes meridionales: tendencias arqueológicas en el sur de Mendoza, Chungará, 40, 5
  25. Salgán, 2009, Fuentes primarias y secundarias en ambientes áridos y de altura del sur Mendocino, Anales de Arqueología y Etnología, 63–64, 247
  26. Scasso, 1997, vol. 1
  27. Seelenfreund, 1996, Trace element analysis of obsidian sources and artifacts of central Chile (Maule River basin) and western Argentina (Colorado River), Latin American Antiquity, 7, 7, 10.2307/3537011 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Shackley, 2008, Archaeological Petrology and the Archaeometry of lithic Materials, Archaeometry, 50, 194, 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2008.00390.x · DOI
  29. Shackley, 2009, The Topaz basin archaeological obsidian source in the Transition zone of central Arizona, Geoarchaeology, 24, 336, 10.1002/gea.20266 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Shelley, 1993, A geoarchaeological Approach to the analysis of secondary lithic deposits, Geoarchaeology, 8, 59, 10.1002/gea.3340080105 · DOI
  31. Shott, 1996, An exegesis of the curation concept, Journal of Anthropological Research, 52, 259, 10.1086/jar.52.3.3630085 · DOI
  32. Stern, 2008, Nueva fuente de obsidiana en la región de la Araucanía, Centro-Sur de Chile: química y contexto arqueológico de la obsidiana riolítica negra de los nevados de Sollipulli, Magallania, 36, 185, 10.4067/S0718-22442008000200014 · DOI
  33. Yacobaccio, 2004, Quest for ancient routes: obsidian sourcing research in Northwestern Argentina, Journal of Archaeological Science, 31, 193, 10.1016/j.jas.2003.08.001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Barberena, R., Hajduk, A., Gil, A. F., Neme, G. A., Durán, V., Glascock, M. D., Giesso, M., Borrazzo, K., de la Paz Pompei, M., Laura Salgán, M., Cortegoso, V., Villarosa, G., & Rughini, A. A.
Venue
Quaternary International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
245
Issue
1
Pages
25-36
ISSN
1040-6182
DOI
10.1016/j.quaint.2010.09.013
Cited by
46
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review