Cited by 29

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Between Sierra and Selva: Landscape transformations in upper Ecuadorian Amazonia

Rostain, Stéphen·2012·Quaternary International

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.quaint.2011.08.031

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The humid montane forests contain some areas of high settlement density, i.e. the mound settlements of the Upano valley, Ecuador.

    “but the humid montane forests contain some areas of high settlement density, i.e. the mound settlements of the Upano valley, Ecuador [31,32].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Athens, 1984, vol. 4
  2. Bushnell, 1946, An archaeological collection from Macas, on the Eastern slopes of the Ecuadorian Andes, Man, 46, 2, 10.2307/2792296 · DOI
  3. Collier, 1943, vol. 35
  4. Evans, 1968, vol. 6
  5. Harner, 1995, vol. 264
  6. Heckenberger, 2003, Amazonia 1492: Pristine Forest or Cultural Parkland?, Science, 301, 1710, 10.1126/science.1086112 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Herod, D.D., 1970. The Versus Style, a Question of Comparability, thesis of the degree Master of Arts, Faculty of San Francisco State College. p 136.
  8. Marcos, 1988, vol. 4–5
  9. Moncayo Echeverria, 1994, Nuevas estructuras piramidales truncas en la margen izquierda del río Upano, provincia de Morona Santiago, Sarance, Revista del Instituto Otavaleño de Antropología, 20, 147
  10. Ochoa, 1997, vol. 2
  11. Porras, 1989, Investigations at the Sangay mound complex, Eastern Ecuador, National Geographic Research, 5, 374
  12. Rampon, 1959, vol. 1
  13. Rostain, S., 1997. El Complejo XI del sitio de montículos de Huapula, nuevos datos sobre la prehistoria del Alto Upano. 49 Congreso Internacional de Americanistas, symposium Intercambio y Comercio en los Andes: Tierras Altas-Tierras Bajas vista desde la arqueología y la etnohistoria, Quito, multigr. p. 20.
  14. Rostain, 1999, Excavación en área de un montículo de Huapula, proyecto Sangay-Upano, vol. 3, 227
  15. Rostain, 1999, Secuencia arqueológica en montículos del valle del Upano en la Amazonía ecuatoriana, Bulletin de l’Institut Français d’Etudes Andines, 28, 1
  16. Rostain, 2006, Etnoarqueología de la casa Huapula y Jívaro, vol. 35(3), 337
  17. Rostain, 2008, Les tertres artificiels du piémont amazonien des Andes, Equateur, vol. 111–112, 83
  18. Rostain, 2010, Cronología del valle del Upano, alta Amazonía ecuatoriana, Bulletin de l'Institut Français d'Etudes Andines, 39, 667, 10.4000/bifea.1825 · DOI
  19. Rostoker, A.G., 1995. Souvenirs from the Magic Mountain? 27th Annual Conference of the Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary, p. 15.
  20. Von Hillebrandt, 1991, Evaluación de los peligros volcánicos y su mitigación en la república del Ecuador, vol. 4, 39

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rostain, S.
Venue
Quaternary International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
249
Pages
31-42
ISSN
1040-6182
Cited by
29
References
0
Language
en
Funders
French Ministry of Foreign Affairs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review