CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Multi-proxy archaeological investigations of a Middle Palaeolithic occupation context in Eastern Transylvania, Romania

Cosac, Marian, Murătoreanu, George, Veres, Daniel, Niţă, Loredana, Schmidt, Christoph, Hambach, Ulrich, Alexandru, Radu, Cuculici, Roxana, Buzea, Dan Lucian, Mărgărit, Monica, Dumitraşcu, Valentin, Vasile, Ştefan, Petculescu, Alexandru, Dénes, Istvan·2018·Quaternary International
DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2017.09.014
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.quaint.2017.09.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Anechitei-Deacu, 2014, Multi-method luminescence investigations on quartz grains of different sizes extracted from a loess section in Southeast Romania interbedding the Campanian Ignimbrite ash layer, Geochronometria, 41, 1, 10.2478/s13386-013-0143-4 · DOI
  2. Backwell, 2001, Evidence of termite foraging by Swartkrans early hominids, PNAS, 98, 1358, 10.1073/pnas.98.4.1358 · DOI
  3. Backwell, 2008, Early hominid bone tools from Drimolen, South Africa, J. Archaeol. Sci., 35, 2880, 10.1016/j.jas.2008.05.017 · DOI
  4. Backwell, 2008, Middle stone age bone tools from the howiesons poort layers, Sibudu Cave, South Africa, J. Archaeol. Sci., 35, 1566, 10.1016/j.jas.2007.11.006 · DOI
  5. Balescu, 2015, Mamaia-sat (Romania): a late middle pleistocene palaeolithic site?, Anthropologie, LIII, 157
  6. Burke, 2008, A middle palaeolithic bone tool from Crimea (Ukraine), Antiquity, 82, 843, 10.1017/S0003598X00097611 · DOI
  7. Buc, 2011, Experimental series and use-wear in bone tools, J. Archaeol. Sci., 38, 546, 10.1016/j.jas.2010.10.009 · DOI
  8. Crégut-Bonnoure, 2007, Apport des Caprinae et Antilopinae (Mammalia, Bovidae) à la biostratigraphie du Pliocène terminal et du Pléistocène d'Europe, Quaternaire, 18, 73
  9. d'Errico, 2009, Assessing the function of early hominin bone tools, J. Archaeol. Sci., 36, 1764, 10.1016/j.jas.2009.04.005 · DOI
  10. Demidenko, 2015, Palaeolithic industries with bifacial technologies and Crimean Micoquian Tradition as one of their Middle Palaeolithic industrial examples, Litikum, 3, 70, 10.23898/litikuma0013 · DOI
  11. Dénes, 2003, Rezervaţia naturală complexă Cheile Vârghişului, Speomond, 7–8, 8
  12. Doboş, 2012, A new AMS radiocarbon date for Middle Paleolithic layer 4 of Ripiceni-Izvor, Romania, Mater. şi Cercet. Arheol. (serie nouă), VIII, 7, 10.3406/mcarh.2012.911 · DOI
  13. Douka, 2010, The influence of pretreatment chemistry on the radiocarbon dating of Campanian Ignimbrite-aged charcoal from Kostenki 14 (Russia), Quat. Res., 73, 583, 10.1016/j.yqres.2010.01.002 · DOI
  14. Gaudzinski, 1999, Middle Palaeolithic bone tools from the open-air site Salzgitter-Lebenstedt (Germany), J. Archaeol. Sci., 26, 125, 10.1006/jasc.1998.0311 · DOI
  15. Hardy, 2014, Un outil en os à usages multiples dans un contexte moustérien, Bull. la Soc. Préhist. Fr., 111, 741, 10.3406/bspf.2014.14466 · DOI
  16. Higham, 2009, Problems with radiocarbon dating the middle to upper palaeolithic transition in Italy, Quat. Sci. Rev., 28, 1257, 10.1016/j.quascirev.2008.12.018 · DOI
  17. Honea, 1984, Cronologia paleoliticului mijlociu şi superior în România. Implicaţiile rezultatelor actuale ale datării cu carbon radioactiv, Rev. Muzeelor şi Monum., 3, 51
  18. Julien, 2015, Characterizing the Lower Paleolithic bone industry from Schöningen 12 II: a multi-proxy study, J. Hum. Evol., 89, 264, 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.10.006 · DOI
  19. Kot, 2014, The earliest Palaeolithic bifacial leafpoints in Central and Southern Europe: techno-functional approach, Quat. Int., 326–327, 381, 10.1016/j.quaint.2013.10.030 · DOI
  20. Kozlowski, 2014, Middle Palaeolithic variability in central Europe: Mousterian vs Micoquian, Quat. Int., 326–327, 344, 10.1016/j.quaint.2013.08.020 · DOI
  21. Kowalski, 2001, Pleistocene rodents of Europe, Folia Quat., 72, 1
  22. Lengyel, 2008, A new look at the radiocarbon chronology of the Szeletian in Hungary, Eurasian Prehist., 5, 73
  23. Magyari, 2014, Vegetation and environmental responses to climate forcing during the Last Glacial Maximum and deglaciation in the East Carpathians: attenuated response to maximum cooling and increased biomass burning, Quat. Sci. Rev., 106, 278, 10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.09.015 · DOI
  24. Masini, 2013, A reappraisal of the early to middle Pleistocene Italian Bovidae, Quat. Int., 288, 45, 10.1016/j.quaint.2012.03.026 · DOI
  25. Mozota Holgueras, 2014, Los útiles óseos “poco elaborados” en el Paleolítico inferior y medio y su continuidad en el Paleolítico superior. Una revisión historiográfica, Complutum, 25, 17, 10.5209/rev_CMPL.2014.v25.n1.45353 · DOI
  26. Outram, 2001, A new approach to identifying bone marrow and grease exploitation: why the ‘‘Indeterminate’’ fragments should not be ignored, J. Archaeol. Sci., 28, 401, 10.1006/jasc.2000.0619 · DOI
  27. Păunescu, 1984, Cronologia paleoliticului şi mezoliticului din România în contextul paleoliticului central – est şi sud european, SCIVA, 35, 235
  28. Petculescu, 2008, Peculiarity of the mammal associations from the upper Pleistocene (Dobrogea, Romania), Quat. Int., 179, 79, 10.1016/j.quaint.2007.08.030 · DOI
  29. Petronio, 2011, Biochronology and palaeoenvironmental changes from the Middle Pliocene to the late Pleistocene in Central Italy, Geodiversitas, 33, 485, 10.5252/g2011n3a4 · DOI
  30. Radulesco, 1965, Contributions à la connaissance des faunes de Mammifères pléistocènes de la Dépression de Braşov (Roumanie), Eiszeitalt. Ggw., 16, 132
  31. Romandini, 2014, A retouched bone shaft from the Late Mousterian at Fumane cave (Italy). Technological, experimental and microwear analysis, Comptes Rendus Palevol, 14, 63, 10.1016/j.crpv.2014.08.001 · DOI
  32. Rosell, 2011, Bone as a technological raw material at the Gran Dolina site (Sierra de Atapuerca, Burgos, Spain), J. Hum. Evol., 61, 125, 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.02.001 · DOI
  33. Rougier, 2016, Neandertal cannibalism and Neandertal bones used as tools in Northern Europe, Nature
  34. Richter, 2016, Leave at the height of the party: a critical review of the Middle Paleolithic in Western Central Europe from its beginnings to its rapid decline, Quat. Int., 411, 107, 10.1016/j.quaint.2016.01.018 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Sidéra, 2006, Tracéologie fonctionnelle des matières osseuses: une méthode, Bull. la Soc. Préhist. Fr., 103, 291, 10.3406/bspf.2006.13434 · DOI
  36. Simionescu, 1969, Elevi pe şantiere arheologice, Rev. Muzeelor, 6, 501
  37. Sirocko, 2016, The ELSA-Vegetation-Stack: reconstruction of Landscape Evolution Zones (LEZ) from laminated Eifel maar sediments of the last 60,000 years, Glob. Planet. Change, 142, 108, 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.03.005 · DOI
  38. Smith, 2012, Middle palaeolithic subsistence: the role of hominins at Lynford, Norfolk, UK, Quat. Int., 252, 68, 10.1016/j.quaint.2011.10.002 · DOI
  39. Soressi, 2013, Neandertals made the first specialized bone tools in Europe, PNAS, 110, 14186, 10.1073/pnas.1302730110 · DOI
  40. Timar-Gabor, 2013, On natural and laboratory generated dose response curves for quartz of different grain sizes from Romanian loess, Quat. Geochronol., 18, 34, 10.1016/j.quageo.2013.08.001 · DOI
  41. Trandafir, 2015, OSL dating of fine and coarse quartz from a Palaeolithic sequence on the Bistriţa Valley (Northeastern Romania), Quat. Geochronol., 30, 487, 10.1016/j.quageo.2014.12.005 · DOI
  42. Tuffreau, 2009, Nouvelles recherches sur le gisement paléolithic de Mitoc Valea Izvorului (dép. de Botoşani). Fouilles 2003-2004, Mater. şi Cercet. Arheol. (serie nouă), V, 21, 10.3406/mcarh.2009.1067 · DOI
  43. van Andel, 1996, Palaeolithic landscapes of Europe and environs, 150,000–25,000 years ago: an overview, Quat. Sci. Rev., 15, 481, 10.1016/0277-3791(96)00028-5 · DOI
  44. Vercoutère, 2010, Les Bovidae (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) du Pléistocène moyen final de l’aven de Romain-la-Roche (Doubs, France), Rev. Paléobiol., 29, 655
  45. Veres, 2009, Climate-driven changes in lake conditions during late MIS 3 and MIS 2: a high-resolution geochemical record from Les Echets, France, Boreas, 38, 230, 10.1111/j.1502-3885.2008.00066.x · DOI
  46. Veres, 2017, New chronological constraints for Middle Palaeolithic (MIS 6/5-3) cave sequences in Eastern Transylvania, Romania, Quat. Int. (this issue)
  47. Wallinga, 2002, On the detection of OSL age overestimation using single-aliquot techniques, Geochronometria, 21, 17
  48. Wood, 2012, Testing the ABOx-SC method: dating known-age charcoals associated with the Campanian Ignimbrite, Quat. Geochronol., 9, 16, 10.1016/j.quageo.2012.02.003 · DOI
  49. Zeeden, 2017, Millennial scale climate oscillations recorded in the Lower Danube loess over the last glacial period, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Cosac, M., Murătoreanu, G., Veres, D., Niţă, L., Schmidt, C., Hambach, U., Alexandru, R., Cuculici, R., Buzea, D. L., Mărgărit, M., Dumitraşcu, V., Vasile, Ş., Petculescu, A., & Dénes, I.
ORCID
Vasile, Ştefan
Venue
Quaternary International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
485
Pages
115-130
ISSN
1040-6182
DOI
10.1016/j.quaint.2017.09.014
Cited by
12
References
0
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SCHM3051/1-1)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-proxy archaeological investigations of a Middle Palaeolithic occupation context in Eastern Transylvania, Romania. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.09.014
The paper
Cosac, M., Murătoreanu, G., Veres, D., Niţă, L., Schmidt, C., Hambach, U., Alexandru, R., Cuculici, R., Buzea, D. L., Mărgărit, M., Dumitraşcu, V., Vasile, Ş., Petculescu, A., & Dénes, I. (2018). Multi-proxy archaeological investigations of a Middle Palaeolithic occupation context in Eastern Transylvania, Romania. Quaternary International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.09.014