Cited by 155Radiation Therapy and DosimetryEffects of Radiation ExposureRadiation Shielding Materials Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluating shielding effectiveness for reducing space radiation cancer risks

Open access
Cucinotta, Francis A., Kim, Myung-Hee Y., Ren, Lei·2006·Radiation Measurements

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.radmeas.2006.03.011

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Badhwar, G.D., 1997. Spaceflight validation of material shielding properties. In: Wilson, J.W., Miller, J., Konradi, A., Cucinotta, F.A. (Eds.), NASA Workshop on Shielding Strategies for Human Space Exploration. NASA-CP-1997-3360.
  2. Center for Disease Control (CDC 2000,2002). National Vital Statistics Report, vol. 51, No. 3, US Life Tables.
  3. Kim, M.Y., Barber, R.E., Shavers, M.R., Nikjoo, H., Cucinotta, F.A., 2003. TEPCs overestimate the average quality factor for trapped protons and underestimate the average quality factor for GCR. Presented at the 14th Annual Space Radiation Health Investigators Workshop.
  4. SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results: Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–2000. Cancer Surveillance Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda MD.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cucinotta, F. A., Kim, M.-H. Y., & Ren, L.
Affiliations
  • Johnson Space Center (US)
  • Wyle (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Cucinotta, Francis A.
Venue
Radiation Measurements
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-10
Volume
41
Issue
9-10
Pages
1173-1185
ISSN
1350-4487 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086394495
Cited by
153
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Radiation Measurements (publishedVersion)
  • NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis
Keywords
space radiation, radiation shielding, cancer risk, galactic cosmic rays, solar energetic particle events, probability distribution functions, risk and uncertainty, significance testing, lunar missions, Mars missions, polyethylene shielding, aluminum shielding, quality factor, secondary radiation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review