Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Towards evidence-based guidelines for radiotherapy infrastructure and staffing needs in Europe: the ESTRO QUARTS project

Open access
Bentzen, Søren M., Heeren, Germaine, Cottier, Brian, Slotman, Ben, Glimelius, Bengt, Lievens, Yolande, van den Bogaert, Walter·2005·Radiotherapy and Oncology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.12.007

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 223

Metadata

Authors
Bentzen, S. M., Heeren, G., Cottier, B., Slotman, B., Glimelius, B., Lievens, Y., & van den Bogaert, W.
Venue
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06
Volume
75
Issue
3
Pages
355-365
ISSN
0167-8140 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075349568
Cited by
223
References
2
FWCI
8.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards evidence-based guidelines for radiotherapy infrastructure and staffing needs in Europe: the ESTRO QUARTS project. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.radonc.2004.12.007
The paper
Bentzen, S. M., Heeren, G., Cottier, B., Slotman, B., Glimelius, B., Lievens, Y., & van den Bogaert, W. (2005). Towards evidence-based guidelines for radiotherapy infrastructure and staffing needs in Europe: the ESTRO QUARTS project. Radiotherapy and Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2004.12.007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.