Cited by 69Advanced Radiotherapy TechniquesMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Improving target delineation on 4-dimensional CT scans in stage I NSCLC using a deformable registration tool

van Dam, Iris E., van Sörnsen de Koste, John R., Hanna, Gerard G., Muirhead, Rebecca, Slotman, Ben J., Senan, Suresh·2010·Radiotherapy and Oncology

Abstract

Introduction Correct target definition is crucial in stereotactic radiotherapy for lung tumors. We evaluated use of deformable registration (DR) for target contouring on 4-dimensional (4D) CT scans.Materials and methods Three clinicians contoured gross tumor volume (GTV) in an end-inspiration phase of 4DCT of 6 patients on two occasions. Two clinicians contoured GTVs in all phases of 4DCT and on maximum intensity projections (MIP). The initial GTV was auto-propagated to 9 other phases using a B-spline algorithm (VelocityAI). Internal target volumes (ITVs) generated were (i) ITV(10manual) encompassing all physician-contoured GTVs, (ii) ITV-MIP(optimized) from MIP after review of individual 4DCT phases, (iii) ITV(10deformed) encompassing auto-propagated GTVs using DR, and (iv) ITV(10deformed-optimized), from an ITV(10deformed) target that was modified to form a 'clinically optimal' ITV. Volume-overlaps were scored using Dice's Similarity Coefficients (DSCs).Results Intra-clinician GTV reproducibility was greater than inter-clinician reproducibility (mean DSC 0.93 vs. 0.88, p<0.0004). In five of 6 patients, ITV-MIP(optimized) differed from the ITV(10deformed-optimized). In all patients, the DSC between ITV(10deformed-optimized) and ITV(10deformed) was higher than that between ITV(10deformed-optimized) and ITV-MIP(optimized) (p<0.02 T-test).Conclusion ITVs created in stage I tumors using DR were closer to 'clinically optimal' ITVs than was the case with a MIP-modified approach.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.05.003

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Dam, I. E., van Sörnsen de Koste, J. R., Hanna, G. G., Muirhead, R., Slotman, B. J., & Senan, S.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre (GB)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-07
Volume
96
Issue
1
Pages
67-72
ISSN
0167-8140 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130535356
Cited by
69
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiotherapy and Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
deformable image registration, 4D-CT, non-small cell lung cancer, stage I lung cancer, gross tumor volume, internal target volume, target volume delineation, stereotactic body radiotherapy, B-spline registration, maximum intensity projection
MeSH terms
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Neoplasm Staging, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted, Sampling Studies, Observer Variation, Radiosurgery, Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review