The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep learning provides a new computed tomography-based prognostic biomarker for recurrence prediction in high-grade serous ovarian cancer
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recurrence is the main risk for high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) and few prognostic biomarkers were reported. In this study, we proposed a novel deep learning (DL) method to extract prognostic biomarkers from preoperative computed tomography (CT) images, aiming at providing a non-invasive recurrence prediction model in HGSOC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 245 patients with HGSOC from two hospitals, which included a feature-learning cohort (n = 102), a primary cohort (n = 49) and two independent validation cohorts from two hospitals (n = 49 and n = 45). We trained a novel DL network in 8917 CT images from the feature-learning cohort to extract the prognostic biomarkers (DL feature) of HGSOC. Afterward, a DL-CPH model incorporating the DL feature and Cox proportional hazard (Cox-PH) regression was developed to predict the individual recurrence risk and 3-year recurrence probability of patients. RESULTS: In the two validation cohorts, the concordance-index of the DL-CPH model was 0.713 and 0.694. Kaplan-Meier's analysis clearly identified two patient groups with high and low recurrence risk (p = 0.0038 and 0.0164). The 3-year recurrence prediction was also effective (AUC = 0.772 and 0.825), which was validated by the good calibration and decision curve analysis. Moreover, the DL feature demonstrated stronger prognostic value than clinical characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: The DL method extracts effective CT-based prognostic biomarkers for HGSOC, and provides a non-invasive and preoperative model for individualized recurrence prediction in HGSOC. In addition, the DL-CPH model provides a new prognostic analysis method that can utilize CT data without follow-up for prognostic biomarker extraction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine
Lambin, P., Leijenaar, R. T. H., Deist, T. M., Peerlings, J., de Jong, E. E. C., van Timmeren, J., Sanduleanu, S., Larue, R. T. H. M., Even, A. J. G., Jochems, A., et al. (2017) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.141 · Cited by 5,688
Moons, K. G. M., Altman, D. G., Reitsma, J. B., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Macaskill, P., Steyerberg, E. W., Vickers, A. J., Ransohoff, D. F., & Collins, G. S. (2015) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m14-0698 · Cited by 5,147
Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach
Aerts, H. J. W. L., Velazquez, E. R., Leijenaar, R. T. H., Parmar, C., Grossmann, P., Carvalho, S., Bussink, J., Monshouwer, R., Haibe-Kains, B., Rietveld, D., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5006 · Cited by 5,132
Identifying Medical Diagnoses and Treatable Diseases by Image-Based Deep Learning
Kermany, D. S., Goldbaum, M., Cai, W., Valentim, C. C. S., Liang, H., Baxter, S. L., McKeown, A., Yang, G., Wu, X., Yan, F., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.010 · Cited by 4,842
Deep learning-based multi-omics integration robustly predicts survival in liver cancer
Chaudhary, K., Poirion, O. B., Lu, L., & Garmire, L. X. (2018) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-0853 · Cited by 1,091
Cited by
Predicting cancer outcomes with radiomics and artificial intelligence in radiology
Bera, K., Braman, N., Gupta, A., Velcheti, V., & Madabhushi, A. (2022) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-021-00560-7 · Cited by 819
The Application of Deep Learning in Cancer Prognosis Prediction
Zhu, W., Xie, L., Han, J., & Guo, X. (2020) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers12030603 · Cited by 380
Boehm, K. M., Aherne, E. A., Ellenson, L., Nikolovski, I., Alghamdi, M., Vázquez-García, I., Zamarin, D., Long Roche, K., Liu, Y., Patel, D., et al. (2022) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-022-00388-9 · Cited by 357
Dense Convolutional Network and Its Application in Medical Image Analysis
Zhou, T., Ye, X., Lu, H., Zheng, X., Qiu, S., & Liu, Y. (2022) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2022/2384830 · Cited by 201
Tong, T., Gu, J., Xu, D., Song, L., Zhao, Q., Cheng, F., Yuan, Z., Tian, S., Yang, X., Tian, J., et al. (2022) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-022-02258-8 · Cited by 77
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, S., Liu, Z., Rong, Y., Zhou, B., Bai, Y., Wei, W., Wei, W., Wang, M., Guo, Y., & Tian, J.
- Venue
- Radiotherapy and Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 132
- Pages
- 171-177
- ISSN
- 0167-8140 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2899491031
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 7.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep learning provides a new computed tomography-based prognostic biomarker for recurrence prediction in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.radonc.2018.10.019
- The paper
- Wang, S., Liu, Z., Rong, Y., Zhou, B., Bai, Y., Wei, W., Wei, W., Wang, M., Guo, Y., & Tian, J. (2019). Deep learning provides a new computed tomography-based prognostic biomarker for recurrence prediction in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Radiotherapy and Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2018.10.019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.