Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 172

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep learning provides a new computed tomography-based prognostic biomarker for recurrence prediction in high-grade serous ovarian cancer

Open access
Wang, Shuo, Liu, Zhenyu, Rong, Yu, Zhou, Bin, Bai, Yan, Wei, Wei, Wei, Wei, Wang, Meiyun, Guo, Yingkun, Tian, Jie·2019·Radiotherapy and Oncology

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recurrence is the main risk for high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) and few prognostic biomarkers were reported. In this study, we proposed a novel deep learning (DL) method to extract prognostic biomarkers from preoperative computed tomography (CT) images, aiming at providing a non-invasive recurrence prediction model in HGSOC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 245 patients with HGSOC from two hospitals, which included a feature-learning cohort (n = 102), a primary cohort (n = 49) and two independent validation cohorts from two hospitals (n = 49 and n = 45). We trained a novel DL network in 8917 CT images from the feature-learning cohort to extract the prognostic biomarkers (DL feature) of HGSOC. Afterward, a DL-CPH model incorporating the DL feature and Cox proportional hazard (Cox-PH) regression was developed to predict the individual recurrence risk and 3-year recurrence probability of patients. RESULTS: In the two validation cohorts, the concordance-index of the DL-CPH model was 0.713 and 0.694. Kaplan-Meier's analysis clearly identified two patient groups with high and low recurrence risk (p = 0.0038 and 0.0164). The 3-year recurrence prediction was also effective (AUC = 0.772 and 0.825), which was validated by the good calibration and decision curve analysis. Moreover, the DL feature demonstrated stronger prognostic value than clinical characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: The DL method extracts effective CT-based prognostic biomarkers for HGSOC, and provides a non-invasive and preoperative model for individualized recurrence prediction in HGSOC. In addition, the DL-CPH model provides a new prognostic analysis method that can utilize CT data without follow-up for prognostic biomarker extraction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.10.019

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 172

Metadata

Authors
Wang, S., Liu, Z., Rong, Y., Zhou, B., Bai, Y., Wei, W., Wei, W., Wang, M., Guo, Y., & Tian, J.
Venue
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
132
Pages
171-177
ISSN
0167-8140 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2899491031
Cited by
172
References
6
FWCI
7.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep learning provides a new computed tomography-based prognostic biomarker for recurrence prediction in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.radonc.2018.10.019
The paper
Wang, S., Liu, Z., Rong, Y., Zhou, B., Bai, Y., Wei, W., Wei, W., Wang, M., Guo, Y., & Tian, J. (2019). Deep learning provides a new computed tomography-based prognostic biomarker for recurrence prediction in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Radiotherapy and Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2018.10.019

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.