Cited by 8Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchClinical practice guidelines implementationPsychology and Mental Health

The relation between practice that is consistent with NICE guideline 142 recommendations and waiting times within Autism Spectrum Disorder diagnostic services

Open access
McKenzie, Karen, Rutherford, Marion, Forsyth, Kirsty, O’Hare, Anne, McClure, Iain, Murray, Aja L., Irvine, Linda·2016·Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rasd.2016.03.002

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Diagnosis duration was unrelated to client gender or service adherence to NICE guidelines, but client characteristics including intellectual disability and additional support needs predicted longer duration.

    “Diagnosis duration was unrelated to client gender (Rutherford, McKenzie, Johnson, et al., 2016) or service adherence to NICE guidelines (McKenzie et al., 2016), but client characteristics including intellectual disability and additional support needs predicted longer duration (McKenzie et al., 2015).”

    From Diagnosis of autism in adulthood: A scoping review (2020) · cites this paper as McKenzie et al., 2016

  • No relationship between adherence score and duration.

    “No relationship between adherence score and duration.”

    From Diagnosis of autism in adulthood: A scoping review (2020) · cites this paper as McKenzie et al. (2016)

  • Mean adherence score was 11.9 out of 14.

    “Mean adherence score was 11.9 out of 14.”

    From Diagnosis of autism in adulthood: A scoping review (2020) · cites this paper as McKenzie et al. (2016)

  • Around half of all cases adhered to all 14 included guideline items.

    “Around half of all cases adhered to all 14 included guideline items.”

    From Diagnosis of autism in adulthood: A scoping review (2020) · cites this paper as McKenzie et al. (2016)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McKenzie, K., Rutherford, M., Forsyth, K., O’Hare, A., McClure, I., Murray, A. L., & Irvine, L.
Affiliations
  • Northumbria University (GB)
  • Queen Margaret University (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • NHS Lothian (GB)
Corresponding author
McKenzie, Karen
Venue
Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
26
Pages
10-15
ISSN
  • 1878-0237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-9467
OpenAlex
W2295276214
Cited by
8
References
15
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research in Autism (publishedVersion)
  • Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, diagnostic waiting times, clinical practice, autism diagnosis, diagnostic services, autistic adults, guideline implementation, Scotland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review