Cited by 13Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic speciesReproductive Biology and Fertility

Evaluation of sperm nuclear integrity in patients with different percentages of decapitated sperm in ejaculates

Rondanino, Christine, Duchesne, Véronique, Escalier, Denise, Jumeau, Fanny, Verhaeghe, France, Peers, Marie-Claire, Mitchell, Valérie, Rives, Nathalie·2015·Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Abstract

The decapitated sperm defect is a rare type of teratozoospermia responsible for male infertility. Spermatozoa from patients affected by this syndrome are used for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) although little is known about their DNA integrity. This study evaluated sperm nuclear alterations in four patients and ten fertile men (control group). Sperm samples were examined by light, transmission electron and high-magnification contrast microscopy and analysed after terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick end labelling, aniline blue staining and fluorescence in-situ hybridization. Spermatozoa from patients presented varying degrees of decapitation, along with morphological and ultrastructural head abnormalities. Whereas the proportion of spermatozoa with fragmented DNA and numerical chromosome abnormalities was similar in patients 1-3 and controls, the percentage of spermatozoa with hypocondensed chromatin was higher in patients 1-3 than in fertile men. Patient 4 presented a distinct phenotype, with an increased proportion of flagellated spermatozoa with DNA strand breaks as well as increased aneuploidy and diploidy rates compared with controls and with patients 1-3. No successful pregnancy resulted from ICSI although embryos were obtained for three patients. The morphological defects and the nuclear alterations observed in spermatozoa of patients with the decapitated sperm syndrome may have contributed to ICSI failures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.04.002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rondanino, C., Duchesne, V., Escalier, D., Jumeau, F., Verhaeghe, F., Peers, M.-C., Mitchell, V., & Rives, N.
Affiliations
  • Cecos (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR)
Corresponding author
Rondanino, Christine
Venue
Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
89-99
ISSN
1472-6483 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004631136
Cited by
13
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Reproductive BioMedicine Online (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Rouen University Hospital
  • University of Rouen
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
teratozoospermia, sperm DNA fragmentation, sperm chromatin condensation, sperm ultrastructure, male infertility, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, aneuploidy, sperm head abnormalities
MeSH terms
Adult, Cell Nucleus, Chromosome Aberrations, Humans, Infertility, Male, Male, Sperm Motility, Spermatozoa, Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, DNA Fragmentation, Semen Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review