Cited by 50Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Biology and Fertility

Patients with acephalic spermatozoa syndrome linked to SUN5 mutations have a favorable pregnancy outcome from ICSI

Fang, Jianzheng, Zhang, Jingjing, Zhu, Fuxi, Yang, Xiaoyu, Cui, Yugui, Liu, Jiayin·2018·Human Reproduction

Abstract

Study question Are Sad1 and UNC84 domain containing 5 (SUN5) mutations associated with the outcomes of ICSI in patients with acephalic spermatozoa syndrome (ASS)? Summary answer Despite highly abnormal sperm morphology, ASS patients with SUN5 mutations have a favorable pregnancy outcome following ICSI. What is known already ASS is a rare cause of infertility characterized by the production of a majority of headless spermatozoa, along with a small proportion of intact spermatozoa with an abnormal head-tail junction. Previous studies have demonstrated that SUN5 mutations may cause ASS. Several studies showed that ICSI could help patients with ASS father children. Study design, size, duration This retrospective cohort study included 11 infertile ASS males with SUN5 mutations. Five of them underwent five ICSI cycles. Their ICSI results were compared to men with ASS without SUN5 mutations (n = 3) and to men with multiple morphological abnormalities of the sperm flagella (MMAF) (n = 9). All ICSI treatments were completed between Jan 2011 and May 2017. Participants/materials, setting, methods Sanger DNA sequencing was used to detect mutations in SUN5. Clinical and biological data were collected from patients at the fertility center. Main results and the role of chance Sanger sequencing validated 11 patients with SUN5 mutations. Three novel mutations in SUN5 (c.829C>T [p.Q277*]; c.1067G>A [p.R356H]; c.211+1 insGT [p.S71Cfs11*]) were identified in three patients. The rates of fertiliz…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/dex382

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fang, J., Zhang, J., Zhu, F., Yang, X., Cui, Y., & Liu, J.
Affiliations
  • Jiangsu Province Hospital (CN)
  • Anhui Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhu, Fuxi
  • Yang, Xiaoyu
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2018-01-10
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
372-377
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2784243792
Cited by
49
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81401251, 81370754, 81170559)
  • Jiangsu Province Special Program of Medical Science (BL2012009, ZX201110, FXK201221)
  • Jiangsu High Education Institutions (JX10231802)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
acephalic spermatozoa syndrome, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, male infertility, sperm flagella abnormalities, fertilization rate, embryo quality, pregnancy outcomes, novel mutations
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Infertility, Male, Male, Membrane Proteins, Mutation, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Proteins, Retrospective Studies, Pregnancy Rate, Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review