The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Industrial blockchain based framework for product lifecycle management in industry 4.0
Abstract
Abstract Product lifecycle management (PLM) aims to seamlessly manage all products and information and knowledge generated throughout the product lifecycle for achieving business competitiveness. Conventionally, PLM is implemented based on standalone and centralized systems provided by software vendors. The information of PLM is hardly to be integrated and shared among the cooperating parties. It is difficult to meet the requirements of the openness, interoperability and decentralization of the Industry 4.0 era. To address these challenges, this paper proposed an industrial blockchain-based PLM framework to facilitate the data exchange and service sharing in the product lifecycle. Firstly, we proposed the concept of industrial blockchain as the use of blockchain technology in the industry with the integration of IoT, M2M, and efficient consensus algorithms. It provided an open but secured information storage and exchange platform for the multiple stakeholders to achieve the openness, interoperability and decentralization in era of industry 4.0. Secondly, we proposed and developed customized blockchain information service to fulfill the connection between a single node with the blockchain network. As a middleware, it can not only process the multi-source and heterogeneous data from varied stages in the product lifecycle, but also broadcast the processed data to the blockchain network. Moreover, smart contract is used to automate the alert services in the product lifecycles. Finally, we illustrated the blockchain-based application between the cooperating partners in four emerging product lifecycle stages, including co-design and co-creation, quick and accurate tracking and tracing, proactive maintenance, and regulated recycling. A simulation experiment demonstrated the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed framework. The results showed that the proposed framework is scalable and efficient, and hence it is feasible to be adopted in industry. With the successful development of the proposed platform, it is promising to provide an effective PLM for improving interoperability and cooperation between stakeholders in the entire product lifecycle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hawk: The Blockchain Model of Cryptography and Privacy-Preserving Smart Contracts
Kosba, A., Miller, A., Shi, E., Wen, Z., & Papamanthou, C. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2016.55 · Cited by 2,227
The Supply Chain Has No Clothes: Technology Adoption of Blockchain for Supply Chain Transparency
Francisco, K., & Swanson, D. (2018) · Logistics · doi:10.3390/logistics2010002 · Cited by 951
Toward an ontology‐driven blockchain design for supply‐chain provenance
Kim, H. M., & Laskowski, M. (2018) · Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management · doi:10.1002/isaf.1424 · Cited by 652
Blockchains everywhere - a use-case of blockchains in the pharma supply-chain
Bocek, T., Rodrigues, B. B., Strasser, T., & Stiller, B. (2017) · 2017 IFIP/IEEE Symposium on Integrated Network and Service Management (IM) · doi:10.23919/inm.2017.7987376 · Cited by 585
Adaptable Blockchain-Based Systems: A Case Study for Product Traceability
Lu, Q., & Xu, X. (2017) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2017.4121227 · Cited by 483
Cited by
Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Grybauskas, A., Vilkas, M., & Petraitė, M. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2867 · Cited by 462
Edge computing for Industry 5.0: fundamental, applications and research challenges
Sharma, M., Tomar, A., & Hazra, A. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3359297 · Cited by 312
Huo, R., Zeng, S., Wang, Z., Shang, J., Chen, W., Huang, T., Wang, S., Yu, F. R., & Liu, Y. (2022) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2022.3141490 · Cited by 268
Towards resilience in Industry 5.0: A decentralized autonomous manufacturing paradigm
Leng, J., Zhong, Y., Lin, Z., Xu, K., Mourtzis, D., Zhou, X., Zheng, P., Liu, Q., Zhao, J. L., & Shen, W. (2023) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.08.023 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, X. L., Wang, W. M., Guo, H., Barenji, A. V., Li, Z., & Huang, G. Q.
- Venue
- Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 63
- Pages
- 101897
- ISSN
- 0736-5845 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2989846875
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 34.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Industrial blockchain based framework for product lifecycle management in industry 4.0. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101897
- The paper
- Liu, X. L., Wang, W. M., Guo, H., Barenji, A. V., Li, Z., & Huang, G. Q. (2020). Industrial blockchain based framework for product lifecycle management in industry 4.0. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101897
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.