Cited by 90Digital Transformation in IndustryEngineering Technology and MethodologiesAdvanced machining processes and optimization

Adaptive reconstruction of digital twins for machining systems: A transfer learning approach

Liu, Shimin, Lu, Yuqian, Zheng, Pai, Shen, Hui, Bao, Jinsong·2022·Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rcim.2022.102390

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, S., Lu, Y., Zheng, P., Shen, H., & Bao, J.
Affiliations
  • Donghua University (CN)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Corresponding author
  • Lu, Yuqian
  • Bao, Jinsong
Venue
Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
78
Pages
102390
ISSN
0736-5845 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283750521
Cited by
90
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 7
FWCI
8.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Engineering Technology and Methodologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced machining processes and optimization
Keywords
digital twin, machining systems, transfer learning, drilling, machining process modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review