A human-cyber-physical system enabled sequential disassembly planning approach for a human-robot collaboration cell in Industry 5.0
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reinforcement learning with a 0.1 learning rate stabilizes systems in harvesting and minimizes construction errors, though exploration risks persist.
“Reinforcement learning with a 0.1 learning rate stabilizes systems in harvesting [28] and minimizes construction errors [34], though exploration risks persist [13].”
From Hybrid Fault-Tolerant Control in Cooperative Robotics: Advances in Resilience and Scalability (2025) · cites this paper as [34]
Cites
Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications
Maddikunta, P. K. R., Pham, Q.-V., B, P., Deepa, N., Dev, K., Gadekallu, T. R., Ruby, R., & Liyanage, M. (2022) · Journal of Industrial Information Integration · doi:10.1016/j.jii.2021.100257 · Cited by 1,890 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hybrid Fault-Tolerant Control in Cooperative Robotics: Advances in Resilience and Scalability
Urrea, C. (2025) · Actuators · doi:10.3390/act14040177 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“…kinematics can increase stiffness by up to 3.5 times in The literature highlights applications in HRC for assembly [12], sustainable disassembly [34], and agricultural harvesting [9], extending relevance to fields like Construction 5.0 and smart agriculture [9,14,32]. coupled systems [36], while…”
Influential
- Authors
- Lou, S., Zhang, Y., Tan, R., & Lv, C.
- Affiliations
- Nanyang Technological University (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Lv, Chen
- Venue
- Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-06
- Volume
- 87
- Pages
- 102706
- ISSN
- 0736-5845 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4389579542
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 24
- FWCI
- 11.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 559 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing (acceptedVersion)
- DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A2084c0156)
- Nanyang Technological University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Manufacturing Process and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Keywords
- disassembly planning, human-robot collaboration, human-cyber-physical systems, remanufacturing, Industry 5.0, task allocation, disassembly sequence, operator ergonomics, human-in-the-loop, human-on-the-loop, multi-objective optimization, grey wolf optimizer, cloud model, Pareto front
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review