Cited by 13Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health Research Topics

Propiedades psicométricas del Inventario de Depresión de Beck-II (BDI-II) en población universitaria colombiana.

Maldonado-Avendaño, Natalia, Castro-Osorio, Rubby, Cardona-Gómez, Pilar·2023·Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rcp.2021.08.007

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maldonado-Avendaño, N., Castro-Osorio, R., & Cardona-Gómez, P.
Affiliations
Universidad El Bosque (CO)
Corresponding author
Maldonado-Avendaño, Natalia
Venue
Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
52
Pages
S51-S59
ISSN
0034-7450 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3086116790
Cited by
13
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
closed
Locations
Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
Beck Depression Inventory-II, depressive symptoms, psychometric properties, university students, Colombian population, internal structure validity, bifactor model, second-order factor model, risk and protective factors, reliability statistics, depression screening instruments, gender differences in depression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review