Cited by 58Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesRecycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production

Upcycling food waste digestate for energy and heavy metal remediation applications

Open access
Chen, Haili, Osman, Ahmed I., Mangwandi, Chirangano, Rooney, David·2019·Resources, Conservation & Recycling: X

Abstract

Anaerobic digestate originating from food waste has been studied herein for two different purposes. Firstly, for combustion, co-granulation of the digestate and medium density fibreboard (MDF) dust with the addition of sodium silicate as the binder was used to produce the granular solid biofuel. It was found that increasing the content of the medium density fibreboard dust could increase the calorific value but had no significant effect on the strength of the final granules. Additionally, a significant reduction of the ash content was also observed. For heavy metal removal, granules made using the digestate and sodium silicate binder were carbonised to produce biochar which was characterised and applied as adsorbent materials. The biochar has a good removal capacity for both lead and cadmium, and the binder concentration had a positive correlation with the removal capacity of the resultant biochar. The maximum lead removal capacity (355.3 mg g−1) of biochar made using 3 wt.% sodium silicate binder, was six times more than the analogous commercial activated carbon. Langmuir model showed better fitting for adsorption data of Pb2+, while the Freundlich model showed better fitting of Cd2+. For both Pb2+ and Cd2+ kinetic data, the pseudo-second-order had a better correlation. Our approach helps aid and facilitate the concept of the circular economy by effectively up-cycling and valorising waste lignocellulosic biomass such as food waste digestate into value-added products.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rcrx.2019.100015

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are uncertainties around decomposition rates of various types of biochar, depending on feedstock and process conditions.

    “Although considered more stable than soil organic carbon, there are certain uncertainties around decomposition rates of various types of biochar, which depends on the feedstock used and process conditions utilized (Osman et al. 2019;Chen et al. 2019).”

    From Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review (2020) · cites this paper as Chen et al. 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 58

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. McDonald, M., Hamilton, J., 2007. Recent developments in soluble silicate based binders and coatings. Conference Proceedings, Institute for Briquetting and Agglomeration.

Authors
Chen, H., Osman, A. I., Mangwandi, C., & Rooney, D.
Affiliations
Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Corresponding author
Osman, Ahmed I.
Venue
Resources, Conservation & Recycling: X
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
3
Pages
100015
ISSN
2590-289X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2969889789
Cited by
58
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Resources Conservation & Recycling X (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Centre for Advanced Sustainable Energy
  • Department for the Economy in Northern Ireland
  • Department of Business, Enterprise and Innovation in the Republic of Ireland
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
Keywords
food waste digestate, anaerobic digestion, upcycling, sodium silicate binder, solid biofuels, biochar, heavy metal adsorption, lead removal, cadmium removal, carbonization, adsorption kinetics, adsorption isotherms, circular economy, lignocellulosic biomass valorization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review