The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The circular bioeconomy: Its elements and role in European bioeconomy clusters
Open accessAbstract
Biomass is projected to play a key role in meeting global climate targets. To achieve a resource-efficient biomass use, European bioeconomy strategies increasingly consider the concept of a circular bioeconomy (CBE). We define the term CBE via a literature review and analyze the concept’s role in north-west European bioeconomy clusters through interviews. We identify strategies regarding the clusters’ feedstock and product focus, and investigate what role biorefineries, circular solutions, recycling and cascading play. Finally, we discuss gaps in CBE literature and the potential contributions of the CBE to sustainability. The analyzed bioeconomy clusters move towards a CBE by increasingly considering residues and wastes as a resource, developing integrated biorefineries and focusing more on material and high value applications of biomass. However, there is so far only little focus on the end-of-life of bio-based products, i.e. on circular product design, recycling and cascading. Key challenges for implementing circular strategies are policies and regulations, costs and the current small size of bio-based markets. Amongst the product sectors the interviewees identified as promising for the bioeconomy, plastics and construction & building materials have most recycling and cascading potential. While the CBE could contribute to improving the sustainability of the bioeconomy, the concept is not inherently sustainable and its potential trade-offs need to be addressed. Especially social aspects, cascading, circular product design, and aspects related to product use seem to be underrepresented in CBE literature, while the topics biorefinery, wastes and residues as well as waste management are significantly covered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Green, circular, bio economy: a comparative analysis of sustainability avenues
D'Amato, D., Droste, N., Allen, B., Kettunen, M., Lähtinen, K., Korhonen, J., Leskinen, P., Matthies, B. D., & Toppinen, A. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.053 · Cited by 1,077
Visions of sustainability in bioeconomy research
Pfau, S., Hagens, J., Dankbaar, B., & Smits, A. (2014) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su6031222 · Cited by 398 · cited 3×
“A strong optimism has been observed regarding the benefits of the bioeconomy (McCormick and Kautto, 2013); some bioeconomy strategies and scientific publications consider the bioeconomy to be inherently sustainable (Hetemäki et al., 2017; Pfau et al., 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialToward a common classification approach for biorefinery systems
Cherubini, F., Jungmeier, G., Wellisch, M., Willke, T., Skiadas, I., Van Ree, R., & de Jong, E. (2009) · Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.172 · Cited by 394
On the circular bioeconomy and decoupling: implications for sustainable growth
Giampietro, M. (2019) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.001 · Cited by 376 · cited 1×
“However, this only holds true if the CBE does not follow the paradigm of continuous economic growth (Giampietro, 2019), offsetting its potential benefits with excessive biomass use and rebound effects (Dalia D’Amato et al., 2018).”
BackgroundTowards Sustainability? forest-based circular bioeconomy business models in finnish SMEs
D'Amato, D., Veijonaho, S., & Toppinen, A. (2020) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2018.12.004 · Cited by 349
Defining the Sharing Economy for Sustainability
Curtis, S. K., & Lehner, M. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11030567 · Cited by 241
Mawhood, R., Gazis, E., de Jong, S., Hoefnagels, R., & Slade, R. (2016) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1644 · Cited by 229
Bais-Moleman, A. L., Sikkema, R., Vis, M., Reumerman, P., Theurl, M. C., & Erb, K.-H. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.153 · Cited by 114
Cited by
Akbarian, A., Andooz, A., Kowsari, E., Ramakrishna, S., Asgari, S., & Cheshmeh, Z. A. (2022) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127774 · Cited by 174
Analyzing the contributions of biofuels, biomass, and bioenergy to sustainable development goals
Raman, R., Sreenivasan, A., Kulkarni, N. V., Suresh, M., & Nedungadi, P. (2025) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.112157 · Cited by 91
Fal, S., Smouni, A., & Arroussi, H. E. (2023) · Environmental Advances · doi:10.1016/j.envadv.2023.100365 · Cited by 96
Bio-Products from Algae-Based Biorefinery on Wastewater: A Review
Catone, C. M., Ripa, M., Geremia, E., & Ulgiati, S. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112792 · Cited by 85
Life cycle assessment (LCA): informing the development of a sustainable circular bioeconomy?
Sevigné-Itoiz, E., Mwabonje, O., Panoutsou, C., & Woods, J. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2020.0352 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Stegmann, P., Londo, M., & Junginger, M.
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation & Recycling: X
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 100029
- ISSN
- 2590-289X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3000411661
- Cited by
- 638
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 143.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The circular bioeconomy: Its elements and role in European bioeconomy clusters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rcrx.2019.100029
- The paper
- Stegmann, P., Londo, M., & Junginger, M. (2020). The circular bioeconomy: Its elements and role in European bioeconomy clusters. Resources, Conservation & Recycling: X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcrx.2019.100029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.