The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The productivity of transport infrastructure investment: A meta-analysis of empirical evidence
Open accessAbstract
Investments in transport infrastructure have been widely used by decision makers to encourage economic growth, particularly during periods of economic downturn. There has been extensive research on the linkage between transport infrastructure and economic performance since the late 1980s, characterised by widely varying evidence. We conduct a meta-analysis of the empirical evidence on the output elasticity of transport infrastructure, based on a sample of 563 estimates obtained from 33 studies. Previous meta-analyses have focused on total public capital and hence cannot appropriately explain the wide variation in the productivity effect of transport infrastructure nor provide guidance to policymakers on the returns to investment in different types of transport infrastructure. Our results indicate that the existing estimates of the productivity effect of transport infrastructure can vary across main industry groups, tend to be higher for the US economy than for European countries, and are higher for roads compared to other modes of transport. The variation in the estimates of the output elasticity of transport is also explained by differences in the methods and data used in previous studies. Failing to control for unobserved heterogeneity and spurious associations tends to result in higher values, while failing to control for urbanisation and congestion levels leads to omitted variable bias. These findings can be used to inform future research on the choice of model specification and estimation and transport-related policy making.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Econometric Analysis of Panel Data
Baltagi, B. H. (2021) · Springer Texts in Business and Economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-53953-5 · Cited by 15,104
Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511811241 · Cited by 8,092
The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade
Holmes, T. J., Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (2000) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1061487 · Cited by 5,032
Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent
Alonso, W. (1964) · Cited by 3,820
Market Size, Trade, and Productivity
MELITZ, M. J., & OTTAVIANO, G. I. P. (2008) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-937x.2007.00463.x · Cited by 2,864
Microeconometrics; Methods and Applications
Barassi, M. R. (2006) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01069_4.x · Cited by 2,434
Infrastructure Investment: A Review Essay
Gramlich, E. (1997) · Financing federal systems · doi:10.4337/9781035303557.00019 · Cited by 1,435
Theory of the Location of Industries
White, L., Weber, A., & Friedrich, C. J. (1931) · Economic Geography · doi:10.2307/140943 · Cited by 1,410
Economics of Agglomeration : Cities, Industrial Location, and Regional Growth
Fujita, M., & Thisse, J. (2002) · Cited by 1,066
Roads to Prosperity? Assessing the Link Between Public Capital and Productivity
Fernald, J. G. (1999) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.89.3.619 · Cited by 892
Metadata
- Authors
- Melo, P. C., Graham, D. J., & Brage-Ardao, R.
- Venue
- Regional Science and Urban Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 695-706
- ISSN
- 0166-0462 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050018806
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 6.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The productivity of transport infrastructure investment: A meta-analysis of empirical evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.05.002
- The paper
- Melo, P. C., Graham, D. J., & Brage-Ardao, R. (2013). The productivity of transport infrastructure investment: A meta-analysis of empirical evidence. Regional Science and Urban Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.05.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.